Troubleshooting guide
Solvent and UV screen inks across eight substrate series: the faults that stop jobs, what causes them, and what to change first.
Uniform Industries · Greater Noida, India · ufindustries.com
Figures are typical for the class and carry their test method. The values that govern a supply are those on the Technical Data Sheet for the grade.
Before you start
Work down the page. Cheap checks before expensive ones, and measure before you change anything.
01
What happens, in order, and the one variable held at each step.
The process
Where this range runs
Control variables
| Variable | Target | How it is measured | How it drifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ink viscosity | The figure on the grade's Technical Data Sheet, held within about 10 % of it, measured at 25 C | Rotational viscometer at a defined shear rate, ISO 3219, at 25 C. Use a flow cup, ISO 2431, only where the TDS quotes a cup figure: screen inks are thixotropic and a cup reading is an approximation of one point on the curve | Rises through the shift as solvent leaves the open tray and the mesh, fastest on a warm press with drying fans running. It shows as screen blocking first, then sawtooth edges, then a thinner deposit |
| Mesh tension | The band the mesh manufacturer gives for that thread count and diameter, broadly 20 to 28 N/cm up to about 90 threads per centimetre, 18 to 24 N/cm from 100 to 140, and lower again above that, matched within about 2 N/cm across a frame and across a colour set | Mesh tension meter read in five positions per frame, centre and four quadrants, before the job and again after 1 000 impressions. Stretch above the working band and let the mesh relax into it before the job | A newly stretched screen relaxes quickly in the first hours and then slowly. As tension falls the deposit thins, the image grows towards the edges and register opens up colour to colour. A fine mesh tensioned to a coarse mesh figure tears instead |
| Off-contact | 1.5 to 3 mm on a flat bed, set so the screen snaps behind the blade and does not lift ahead of it | Steel rule or feeler gauge at the centre and the four corners with the screen at print position | Rises when the bed or the frame moves, and is often increased deliberately to cure blocking. Every increase grows the image and makes orange peel worse |
| Squeegee durometer and edge | 70 to 75 Shore A polyurethane with a sharp square edge for general graphics; 60 to 65 for a heavy deposit, 80 for fine detail | Durometer to ASTM D2240 at several points along the blade, taken on the flat at least 12 mm back from the printing edge with at least 6 mm of rubber under the foot, and compared against a new blade of the same type read in the same place. Readings closer to the edge are not valid D2240 readings and read low for geometric reasons alone. Inspect the edge separately under a loupe and against a steel straight edge | Solvent swells and softens the blade through a shift and abrasion rounds the edge. The deposit thickens, the edge definition goes, and a nick prints as a streak in the same place on every sheet |
| Squeegee pressure | The lowest setting that sweeps the mesh clean in one pass, then locked and recorded | The press scale, plus a printed test sheet at that setting kept with the job ticket | Creeps up through the shift as operators chase other faults. Higher pressure thins the deposit, grows the image and wears the stencil, so it makes three faults while curing none |
| Stencil thickness over the mesh | About 15 to 25 % of the mesh thickness for line and halftone work, higher where a heavy deposit is wanted | Stencil thickness gauge over the thread knuckle in several positions, recorded at coating and again after the run | Abrades through the run and loses thickness at every reclaim. Edge definition goes first and the deposit follows |
| Ink and press room temperature | Ink 20 to 25 C in the tray, press room 20 to 25 C at 45 to 55 % RH | Probe thermometer in the tray, hygrometer at the press, both read at the start and the middle of the shift | The tray warms near dryers and lamps. Roughly, every 10 C rise halves the working life of a two-pack. Drying-in accelerates with temperature too but less steeply, since solvent vapour pressure roughly doubles over 15 to 20 C, and in practice it is air movement over the mesh rather than tray temperature that decides how fast the screen dries in |
Control variables
| Variable | Target | How it is measured | How it drifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst ratio and pot life | The ratio and the pot life on the grade's Technical Data Sheet, by weight. Broadly 6 to 12 h across our two-pack screen systems, and at the short end, 6 to 8 h, for the silane bonding glass grades. The TDS figure is quoted at 20 C and shortens sharply above it | Balance for both components, weighed in nitrile gloves and eye protection under local exhaust ventilation to the hardener's Safety Data Sheet, with the time of catalysis written on the tin and on the job ticket | The cross-linking reaction runs whether or not the press does. Viscosity climbs slowly and then quickly; the last hour before gelation prints rough and blocks the screen |
| UV dose and peak irradiance at the substrate | The grade's stated minimum, measured at the substrate. A screen film of 8 to 30 micron needs more than an offset or flexo film of the same chemistry | Band-calibrated radiometer passed through the machine at running speed, backed by 30 MEK double rubs to the house condition, which is a hammer weighted to 1 kg with a defined cloth and stroke, following the general practice of ASTM D5402 | Lamp output falls with hours and the quartz devitrifies. Short-wave output goes first, so the surface turns tacky before the body of the film softens. LED arrays drift instead: output falls, diodes die and cooling degrades, with no visible change to look at |
| Oven schedule, part temperature and dwell | The grade's TDS decides, and it is the part temperature that counts, not the panel setting. For our two-pack screen systems on heat-tolerant substrates expect a force-dry of the order of 15 to 30 min at 80 to 120 C, with full chemical resistance developing over a further 24 to 72 h at 23 C. On heat-sensitive substrates, foam, leather, vinyl, PET-G, thin styrene and wax, the schedule is limited by the substrate and not by the ink, so air-dry or low-temperature jet-dry times apply instead | Trailing thermocouple through the tunnel recording air and substrate temperature against time, never the panel setting | The panel reading and the real air temperature separate as filters load and the conveyor fills. A short dwell at a high temperature skins the film and traps solvent under it, and on a heat-sensitive substrate it distorts the part before it dries the ink |
| Substrate surface energy | 40 mN/m or above after treatment as the house target, with the grade's TDS giving the figure it needs; 38 to 42 mN/m covers most screen work on plastics | Dyne pens or ISO 8296 test inks on the parts about to be run, or ASTM D2578 wetting tension on film where the material allows the test. Measure at the edges and wherever the part is handled, not only in the middle | Treatment decays in store as polar groups reorient into the bulk, faster when the stock is warm. Untreated PE and PP sit at roughly 18 to 31 mN/m and never reach the target without treatment or a grade built for untreated polyolefin |
The mechanism
Ink is not pushed through the mesh. The blade shears it into the open stencil and brings the mesh into line contact with the substrate; the transfer itself happens behind the blade as the screen peels away and the ink chooses the substrate over the thread. The deposit is therefore set by the open volume of the mesh and the thickness of the stencil, not by squeegee pressure. Pressure only has to be enough to close that line of contact, and everything above that amount grows the image, thins the film and wears the stencil. This is why almost every fault on the press floor gets worse when the answer is more pressure.
02 | 20 faults
Symptom, cause, check, change, confirm. The trap is the move to avoid.
Fault 1 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The first prints of the run are clean, then fine detail and halftone dots close in and solids lose density. The operator ends up washing the screen every few sheets, and the worst areas are the ones the squeegee reaches last.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 1 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Run 500 impressions without a screen wash, then measure the finest line or dot at the start, the middle and the end on a print microscope: less than 10 % closure, with solid density inside the tolerance agreed with the customer, read on one instrument at a stated density status and geometry, ISO 5-3 for the spectral condition and ISO 5-4 for the geometry, or as dE00 to ISO 13655 with M1 illumination where a spectrophotometer is available.THE TRAP
Adding thinner. It drops viscosity for about ten minutes, then leaves faster than the original solvent blend and puts the ink back where it started, with a thinner film, weaker colour and worse adhesion. The fault is evaporation rate, so the answer is retarder, not thinner.Fault 2 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Straight edges look serrated under a loupe, small text fills in at the corners and fine reverses close up. In halftone and process work a coarse interference pattern appears across the tint and the printed tone reads heavier than the film. The edge fault is usually worse on edges running one particular way across the sheet.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 2 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Print a resolution target and a tint ladder and read them at 30x on a print microscope: no visible serration on the held lines, the finest reverse the job needs still open, no interference pattern visible in the tints at 300 mm, tone value increase repeatable between screens and inside the tolerance agreed with the customer, and the same result on five consecutive sheets.THE TRAP
Winding squeegee pressure up to sharpen the edge. More pressure bends the mesh forward under the blade and drives ink under the stencil, so the edge gets worse while the image also grows and the register opens up.Fault 3 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The solid carries an even dimpled texture visible in reflection, and gloss reads low and patchy. Most obvious on dark solids and on gloss UV work.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 3 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Gloss at 60 degrees, ISO 2813, inside 5 gloss units of the approved sample at three positions across the sheet, and no mesh pattern visible under raking light at 300 mm.THE TRAP
Raising squeegee pressure to press the texture flat. Levelling happens after release, so pressure cannot touch it; what pressure does do is distort the image and force ink under the stencil edge.Fault 4 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Small round holes with a raised rim in the solid. In the same place on sheet after sheet when the cause is in the screen, scattered at random when it is in the substrate or the ink.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 4 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Fifty consecutive prints inspected under raking light with no pinhole larger than 0.2 mm in a solid, checked again at 24 h in case slow retraction continues after the press.THE TRAP
Adding a flow additive or more thinner to close the holes. It lowers the ink's surface tension slightly, which hides a light case and makes a heavy one worse by thinning the film, and it does nothing about the silicone, which will still be in the room on the next job. A screen-side pinhole is a different fault altogether: an uncoated speck in the stencil prints an unwanted ink dot in a clear area, and that belongs with stencil breakdown and the degreasing record.Fault 5 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Fine continuous lines of heavier or lighter ink in the squeegee direction, in the same position on every sheet, often only noticed on a large solid.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 5 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Twenty sheets after the change inspected at raking light with no line visible at 500 mm, density variation across the stroke direction inside the tolerance agreed with the customer at a stated density status, and the first sheets taping to the same classification as the rest of the run.THE TRAP
Increasing pressure so the blade cleans the mesh over a nick. It bends the blade onto its face, widens the contact, thickens the whole deposit and wears the nick into a groove.Fault 6 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The print looks right and the film is hard, but a cross-cut and tape pull takes it off, or a thumbnail scratches through to the substrate. It often passes at the press and fails the next day.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 6 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
On rigid material, ISO 2409 cross-cut with the 1 mm cutter at classification 0 or 1 at 24 h. On rubber, latex, foam, leather and wax, a scribe and tape with no lift plus the agreed dry and wet rub count, since the cross-cut is not valid there. In both cases at least 30 MEK double rubs at the house condition with no breakthrough where solvent resistance is specified, and the end-use resistance the article is actually specified on, all on the customer's own material.THE TRAP
Increasing the film weight to get more adhesion. A heavier film stores more shrinkage stress and takes longer to release solvent, so it usually adheres worse. Adhesion is a property of the ink and the substrate together, qualified on the customer's own material, and it is never a property of the ink alone.Fault 7 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The first hundred prints hide the substrate and the last hundred do not, or a white looks thin after the screen has been washed and re-hung. Measured film thickness has fallen.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 7 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Density, or L* on a white, read at the start, at every 250 impressions and at the end, all inside the tolerance agreed with the customer, with cured film thickness at the end matching the start inside the repeatability of the method actually used, and the method recorded alongside the number.THE TRAP
Chasing opacity with more pressure and a slower stroke. Both of them reduce the deposit. Opacity is set by the open volume of the mesh and the stencil, which means it is a decision made before the job starts, not a knob on the press.Fault 8 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The film has body and will not scratch off, but it feels tacky or greasy, marks in the stack, and a dense black or a heavy white is worse than a process colour.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 8 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Thirty MEK double rubs at the house condition with no breakthrough, no thumb-twist mark at the delivery with the twist made in a nitrile glove, and no set-off in a stack built 30 min after cure and left overnight under its own weight. Never test a tacky UV film with bare skin: an inhibited surface holds unreacted acrylate monomer and acrylate sensitisation is permanent.THE TRAP
Reaching for conveyor speed first. Slowing the press raises dose but leaves peak irradiance unchanged, and it is irradiance, not dose, that beats oxygen at the surface, so it is a weak and expensive answer to a tacky face. It does help through-cure in a heavy deposit, which is why it sometimes appears to work. Raise irradiance first, through lamp to substrate distance, reflector, focus and lamp age, and treat speed as the last adjustment.Fault 9 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Sheets or parts stick together, the back of one carries a ghost of the print below, or the print marks under its own weight after a few hours in a pile.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 9 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A blocking test, print face against unprinted back, 24 h at 40 C under a defined load, with no transfer and no gloss change on separation, gloss read to ISO 2813. On heat-sensitive substrates run the same test at the highest temperature the article will actually see.THE TRAP
Turning the oven up. A hotter surface skins faster and locks the solvent underneath, so blocking gets worse while the panel says the oven is hotter. Dwell at part temperature, not panel temperature, is what takes solvent out of a thick screen film.Fault 10 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The second and third colours will not fit the first. The error is small at the centre and grows towards the edges of the image, and it gets worse as the run goes on.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 10 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A register target measured on ten sheets spread through the run, with edge to centre error inside the job tolerance and no drift between the first sheet and the last.THE TRAP
Rescaling the film or the artwork to make the job fit. It corrects one screen at one tension on one day and has to be redone every time the frame relaxes. It also buries the tension problem, which is simultaneously causing the sawtooth edges and the deposit drift on the same job.Fault 11 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The image loses its edge, ink appears where it should not, or the emulsion lifts from the mesh in patches, usually starting in the squeegee contact area or at the edges of the image.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 11 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
The stencil completes the full run length with no loss of edge at 30x under a loupe, and the exposure calculator step is written on the job ticket so the repeat order starts from the same place.THE TRAP
Touching a failing stencil in with blockout on press. It bridges the hole for a few hundred impressions, and the emulsion around it shares the same exposure and wear history, so the next failure is already on its way.Fault 12 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The ink works for the first few hours, then goes short and rubbery. It will not thin properly, the print looks rough and the screen starts blocking within minutes.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 12 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Two separate numbers, and they are not the same number. Working viscosity held within about 10 % of the TDS figure throughout the window, by the TDS method at the tray's actual temperature, because that is what the press needs; and the unadjusted climb of the catalysed tray read hourly, where a rise of the order of 20 % across the working window is normal for a cross-linking system and a sharp rise after it is the signal to discard rather than to thin. The tray is emptied at the end of the pot life window, not at the end of the shift.THE TRAP
Thinning a ropy two-pack to keep it running. Solvent lowers the viscosity but does nothing to the network that has already formed, so the film prints with less body, less adhesion and less chemical resistance. The customer finds that on the finished part rather than at the press.Fault 13 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The solid breaks up into islands or shows an uneven mottled texture. Worst on polyolefins and on parts that came straight out of the mould or out of a store bag.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 13 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Wetting tension at or above the grade's stated requirement across the whole part, an even solid under raking light at 300 mm, and ISO 2409 class 0 or 1 at 24 h on the customer's own parts where the part is rigid enough for the cross-cut to mean anything.THE TRAP
Adding thinner so the ink wets better. Thinner reduces viscosity, not surface tension in any useful degree, and the thinner film that results retracts more easily. Treat the surface instead.Fault 14 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
On rubber, latex, foam, leather and flexible vinyl the print looks correct flat, then crazes or flakes when the part is stretched, folded or compressed. Balloons and foam sheets show it first.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 14 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
The part passes the customer's own flex, stretch or compression test with no crazing, tested at 24 h and again after seven days at 40 C.THE TRAP
Adding a flexibiliser or a soft extender to a rigid grade at the press. The addition is uncontrolled, it lowers cross-link density everywhere, and the same film then fails the chemical and scratch resistance the job was specified on. Change the series instead.Fault 15 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The same colour prints heavier or lighter on the second screen, or the afternoon run does not match the morning. The difference is usually in strength rather than in hue.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 15 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
dE00 inside the tolerance agreed with the customer, 2.0 being a workable figure for general repeat work, measured to ISO 13655 with M1 illumination, D50 and the 2 degree observer, on the production substrate at the start, the middle and the end of the run. State on the job ticket which dE formula the tolerance refers to, because dE*ab and dE00 are not interchangeable and differ by roughly a factor of two on the saturated solids screen printing produces.THE TRAP
Correcting a strength difference by adding toner at the press. It moves the whole run away from the standard and cannot be reproduced on the next order. Put the deposit back to specification first, and most strength differences disappear on their own.Fault 16 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Sheets cling or repel each other, dust and fibre land on the substrate in the last second before printing, and fine detail shows a halo of spattered ink around it.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 16 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Field meter readings back below the level at which the fault started, and 50 consecutive prints with no dust inclusion and no spatter halo under a loupe.THE TRAP
Wiping the parts with an antistatic spray. Most of them leave a surfactant film, which is exactly the low energy contamination that then produces pinholes and adhesion failure on the same job, a day later and on a different shift.Fault 17 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The tape test passes at the press and the same print fails after humid storage, a wash cycle or a few days in a warehouse. The ink comes away cleanly and leaves bare glass.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 17 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
ISO 2409 cross-cut at class 0 after the agreed humidity or wash exposure on the customer's own glass, with the result recorded as the qualification for that article, that decoration area and that wash schedule.THE TRAP
Accepting the day-one tape test as the answer. It tells you nothing about the bond that matters, because the failure mechanism needs water and time. A glass job is qualified after ageing, or it is not qualified.Fault 18 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
On wax the print rubs or flakes at the edges during handling, or the customer reports that the print discolours the flame or leaves residue as the candle burns down.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 18 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Tape and thumbnail at 24 h with no removal, plus a burn test on the customer's own candle. Burn behaviour belongs to the finished candle, wax, wick, coverage and print position together, so it is assessed on that article, against EN 15493 and EN 15426 where those apply to it, and the recorded result is the acceptance for that article and that wax.THE TRAP
Treating wax as though it were a plastic and reaching for treatment or a primer. Flame treating a candle is not a process, and a primer sits on the same soft, blooming layer the ink was sitting on. The variables are the ink class, the wax formulation and the printed area.Fault 19 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Fine hairline cracks in the substrate under and around the print, silvery in reflection, on polycarbonate, acrylic, ABS and polystyrene. It appears hours to days after printing rather than at the press, is worst at gate marks, weld lines, inserts, machined edges and anywhere the part is held in a fixture, and the part often fails at a load it carried before it was printed.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 19 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Printed parts from the production batch held 72 h at 23 C with no craze visible at 10x, and the part still passing its own mechanical acceptance, tested on the customer's own mouldings and repeated on any new tool, polymer grade or material batch.THE TRAP
Changing colour and calling it a formulation fault. Every ink in the same class carries the same solvent family, so the next one crazes the same part. The three variables are the polymer, the moulding stress and the solvent, and only the solvent and the film weight are yours to change at the press.Fault 20 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
A tape pull takes a multi-colour print off in layers rather than off the substrate, or removes the whole print under a varnish that passed on its own. Common where the print was left overnight between colours, and where a UV varnish goes over a fully cured solvent ink.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 20 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Cross-cut and tape at each interface at 24 h on the customer's own material, with the classification recorded interface by interface rather than for the construction as a whole, plus the varnished area passing the resistance the finished article is specified on.THE TRAP
Reading a pass on the top surface as a pass for the construction. Intercoat bond strength is a property of the build, not of any one ink, so it is qualified on the finished construction and re-qualified whenever a layer, a varnish or the interval between passes changes.03
One page to work from, and the methods behind every number.
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Screen blocks up, detail closing | Cycle time against the TDS open time; then air movement over the screen | Fans to minimum, flood on every stop, retarder in 2 to 3 % steps. Not thinner |
| Sawtooth or ragged edges | Stencil thickness over the mesh, then tension at five points | Extra face coats on the stencil; re-tension to the mesh maker's band |
| Moire or heavy dot gain in a tint | Mesh count against the ruling, mesh angle against the screen angle | Finer mesh or coarser ruling, and a lighter deposit. Re-plan, do not re-press |
| Orange peel on the solid | Off-contact at centre and corners; time to the lamp | Lower off-contact, slow the stroke, move the first lamp back |
| Pinholes with a raised rim | Two consecutive sheets: repeating or random defect positions | Clean the substrate and find the silicone source in the room |
| Streaks with the stroke | Squeegee edge under a loupe at the streak position | Dress or change the blade; check it suits the solvent |
| Ink tapes off | MEK rubs first to split cure from adhesion, then dyne level on the parts | Under-cure to the oven or the lamp; wetting to the treater or the series |
| Opacity falling through the run | Mesh tension and squeegee pressure against the start settings | Pressure back to the locked setting; coarser mesh for opacity |
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| UV surface tacky, body hard | Peak irradiance and dose at the substrate with a radiometer | Raise irradiance first: lamp distance, reflector, lamp age. Speed last, and only for through-cure |
| Blocking or set-off in the stack | Oven dwell at part temperature with a trailing thermocouple; retarder percentage | Extend dwell, cut retarder, rack instead of stacking |
| Register opens towards the edges | Tension on all frames in the set, then off-contact | Match frames within 2 N/cm; drop off-contact to clean snap |
| Stencil breaking down mid-run | Exposure calculator step; emulsion type against the ink solvent | Full exposure plus post-exposure; solvent-resistant emulsion |
| Two-pack going short in the tray | Time of catalysis on the tin against the pot life on that TDS | Discard and mix fresh in shift-sized batches. Do not thin it |
| Ink crawls into islands on plastics | Dyne pens on the actual parts, edges included | Treat immediately before print; check for mould release |
| Print cracks when flexed | Film thickness and catalyst ratio by weight | Thinner film, and the flexible series for that substrate |
| Plastic crazes under the print days later | Annealed part against as-moulded from the same batch; swab test with ink, thinner and wash | Take the aggressive solvent out, cut the film weight, keep the part unstressed 72 h |
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Colour lifts colour, or varnish lifts the print | Tape each interface separately on one sheet; time between passes | Overprint inside the TDS window, or a tie coat between the layers |
| Shade drifts shift to shift | Tin stirred to the bottom and a drawdown against the retained standard | Put the deposit back to specification before touching the colour |
| Dust and spatter halo on plastics | Field meter at feeder, print station and delivery; RH at the press | Earth the press, fit bars over the bed, RH to 45 to 55 % |
| Glass passes day one, fails in a week | Cross-cut after humidity or wash exposure, not at the press | Silane bonding system, clean dry glass, full cure schedule |
| Print flakes off a candle | Grade in use and the casting temperature at print | UniScreen-02WAX on cool stabilised wax, lighter film, agreed print area |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-cut adhesion | ISO 2409 | Grid cut through to the substrate, tape pulled, classified 0 to 5. Blade spacing is set by film thickness: 1 mm spacing with six cuts each way for films up to 60 micron on a hard substrate, 2 mm for 61 to 120 micron, 3 mm for 121 to 250 micron, and 2 mm at the thin end only where the substrate is soft. A screen film of 8 to 30 micron therefore takes the 1 mm cutter; a wider cutter cuts fewer edges, lifts fewer squares and reports a better class than the print has earned. Expect class 0 or 1 read at 24 h after conditioning at 23 C and 50 % RH. The test is valid on rigid, smooth material only: on rubber, latex, foam, leather and wax the blade sinks into the substrate and the tape lifts substrate rather than ink, so use a scribe and tape with an agreed rub count there. Adhesion is an interface property, so the result counts only on the customer's own material. |
| Solvent rub resistance | ASTM D5402, as a practice | MEK double rubs following the general practice of ASTM D5402. The standard describes a cheesecloth-wrapped finger or a weighted hammer with the operator applying pressure; it does not specify a load, so the load, the cloth, the stroke length and the number of rubs are written down and held constant. A hammer weighted to 1 kg is the house condition, not a figure from the standard. Carry the test out under local exhaust or in a fume cupboard, in nitrile gloves and eye protection, away from ignition sources: MEK has a flash point near minus 6 C. At least 30 double rubs with no breakthrough to the substrate is the working acceptance for UV screen grades and fully cured two-pack systems. It reads cure, not adhesion: rub first, then tape. |
| Wetting tension | ASTM D2578, or ISO 8296 test inks | Test inks or dyne pens on the material as it is at the press. For screen inks on plastics expect to need 38 to 42 mN/m, with 40 mN/m or above as the house target after treatment and the grade's TDS giving the figure. Untreated PE and PP sit at roughly 18 to 31 mN/m and will not reach it without treatment or a grade built for untreated polyolefin. Measure the reel or the parts you are about to run, because treatment decays in store. |
| Viscosity | ISO 3219 rotational, or ISO 2431 flow cup where the TDS quotes a cup | The working figure for a screen ink is the one on its TDS at 25 C. Screen inks are thixotropic, so a rotational measurement at a defined shear rate is the reliable method and a flow cup reading is an approximation of a single point. Hold within about 10 % of the TDS figure through the shift. On a catalysed two-pack, hold the working figure by the TDS method and record the unadjusted climb separately: the two are different numbers and only the first one is what the press needs. |
| Mesh tension | No standard number applies; read in N/cm on a calibrated mesh tension meter | Five positions per frame, centre and four quadrants. Work in the band the mesh manufacturer gives for that thread count and diameter, broadly 20 to 28 N/cm up to about 90 threads per centimetre, 18 to 24 N/cm from 100 to 140 and lower again above that, with no more than about 2 N/cm spread across a frame and frames in a colour set matched to the same band. A single tension figure applied to every mesh over-tensions the fine counts and under-tensions the coarse ones. This is still the most useful number in a screen room. |
| UV dose and peak irradiance | No standard number applies; band-calibrated radiometer at the substrate | Pass the puck through the machine at running speed and record dose in mJ/cm2 and peak irradiance in W/cm2. Irradiance decides surface cure against oxygen inhibition; dose decides cure at depth. A screen film needs more than an offset or flexo film of the same chemistry because it is many times thicker. Each grade's minimum is on its Technical Data Sheet, and the source matters: a medium-pressure mercury arc is rated at about 1 000 to 2 000 h, an LED array typically at 20 000 h or more with output drift rather than devitrification as the failure mode. |
| Squeegee hardness | ASTM D2240, Shore A | Read along the length of the blade, not at one point, on the flat at least 12 mm back from the printing edge with at least 6 mm of rubber under the foot. A reading taken close to the printing edge is not a valid D2240 reading and comes out several points low for geometric reasons alone, which is easily mistaken for solvent attack. 70 to 75 Shore A is the usual starting point for graphics on a flat bed, 60 to 65 for a heavy deposit and 80 for fine detail. A drop of several points through a shift, read in the same place and compared with a new blade, means the solvent is attacking the blade. |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Film thickness | No single standard applies; the substrate decides the method | An eddy-current or magnetic coating thickness gauge reads on metal only and reads nothing at all on plastics, glass, wood, leather, foam or wax. On glass and rigid plastics use a micrometer or dial gauge reading printed against unprinted at the same point, or a cross-section under a microscope; on absorbent stock use a wet-film comb converted by the solids figure on the TDS. Typical cured screen deposits are 8 to 30 micron for graphics. Record the method with the number, and set the run-to-run tolerance from the repeatability of that method rather than from a flat percentage. |
| Specular gloss | ISO 2813, 60 degrees | Used to quantify orange peel, mesh marking and post-cure haze against an approved sample. Inside 5 gloss units of the standard is a workable acceptance for a gloss screen solid; the tolerance for a job is the one agreed with the customer. |
| Colour and density measurement | ISO 13655 for spectral measurement; ISO 5-3 and ISO 5-4 for reflection density | Measure colour with a spectrophotometer to ISO 13655 with M1 illumination, D50 and the 2 degree observer, and report dE00 against the approved standard. State which dE formula a tolerance refers to, because dE*ab and dE00 differ by roughly a factor of two on saturated screen solids. Where density is used instead, state the density status, which is the spectral condition of ISO 5-3, and the geometry of ISO 5-4, and read the whole run on one instrument. A density tolerance quoted without those conditions is not a number anyone can repeat. |
| Light fastness | Filtered xenon arc exposure, scored against the blue wool references of ISO 105-B01 and ISO 105-B02 | Xenon exposure assessed against the blue wool scale. Indoor graphics are usually specified at 5 to 6 and exterior or long-life work at 7 to 8, which restricts the pigment choice and therefore the gamut. The figure for a given shade is on its Technical Data Sheet, and a mixed shade is only as fast as its weakest component. Agree the exposure conditions, the irradiance, the black standard temperature and the end point in the specification rather than relying on a standard number alone, because the graphic technology method for prints and printing inks, ISO 12040, has been withdrawn from the ISO catalogue. |
| Resistance beyond adhesion | No single standard applies; the article's specification decides | A print that passes the cross-cut can still fail in service. Scratch and scuff, hand cream, sanitiser, fuel, cleaning agent and sterilisation resistance are what cosmetics, medical, automotive and industrial parts are actually specified on, and they are tested to an agreed reagent, contact time, load and stroke count on the customer's own part, after the full cure schedule and after the ageing the article will see. Record the conditions with the result; a resistance claim without the reagent and the contact time means nothing. |
When the press-floor fixes have not worked