Troubleshooting guide
Faults, causes and fixes for solvent flexo surface print on PE, woven PP and kraft sacks, with the method behind every number.
Uniform Industries · Greater Noida, India · ufindustries.com
Figures are typical for the class and carry their test method. The values that govern a supply are those on the Technical Data Sheet for the grade.
Before you start
Work down the page. Cheap checks before expensive ones, and measure before you change anything.
01
What happens, in order, and the one variable held at each step.
The process
Control variables
| Variable | Target | How it is measured | How it drifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Press viscosity | 16 to 18 s process and tone on 360 to 500 l/cm; 18 to 20 s line and solid on 180 to 300 l/cm; 20 to 22 s kraft and woven sack on 100 to 160 l/cm; 18 to 22 s overprint varnish | DIN 4 mm flow cup to DIN 53211, which is withdrawn as a standard but remains the working method for that cup. If an ISO 2431 4 mm cup is used instead, say so on the job card and never interchange the two figures; the geometries differ and the seconds differ on the same ink. Sample and cup both at 25 plus or minus 1 C, which is a house condition set for our press halls and not the 23 C of ISO 2431 or the 20 C of DIN 53211, so the temperature is quoted with every figure. Orifice checked against a calibration oil or a certified reference cup on a stated interval. | Climbs steadily through a shift as the fast fraction leaves an open pan. A straight climb is evaporation; a step is somebody's addition. Reading it at press-hall temperature instead of 25 C hides both. |
| Surface energy at the print station | 38 mN/m minimum on corona-treated PE and woven PP for surface print; 40 to 44 mN/m where the print is later laminated. Do not chase treatment above about 44 mN/m: over-treatment generates low molecular weight oxidised material, which is a weak boundary layer in its own right and fails in store exactly as bloom does, and on thin film in a nip it treats the reverse face as well, which then blocks. The real control is watt density and dose at the treater, not the dyne reading alone. | ISO 8296 test liquids or dyne pens on the reel about to run, read at 2 s, three points across the width plus both edges; ASTM D2578 in the laboratory. The liquids are formamide and 2-ethoxyethanol mixtures, both reproductive toxicants absorbed through the skin: nitrile gloves, no skin contact, cap immediately, swabs to solvent waste. Prefer a formamide-free set where one is qualified against ISO 8296. Keep the set in date, because a set that has aged or taken up water reads the film low and gets a good reel rejected. | Falls in store, typically to 34 to 36 mN/m over four to six weeks on a high-slip PE, faster in a warm store. It falls fastest at the edges and on the face that carried the antiblock. Confirm ozone extraction on the treater is running whenever treatment is raised. |
| Ink temperature in the tray and in the loop | 25 to 30 C measured in the ink itself at the tray or chamber, and below 32 C anywhere in the circulation loop including the return | Probe thermometer in the ink, not an air reading, taken at the tray or chamber and again at the return into the drum | Rises through the shift from dryer return air and pump work. Above about 32 C an ethanol-led 210PA blend is losing its fast fraction continuously, so the ink is gone before the plate reaches impression and the plate starts to fill. |
| Anilox volume against ruling | Volume is meaningless without the ruling it belongs to, and both go on the job card. About 2.5 to 5 cm3/m2 on 360 to 500 l/cm for process and tone; about 6 to 12 cm3/m2 on 180 to 300 l/cm for line and solid on film; about 14 to 25 cm3/m2 on 100 to 160 l/cm for kraft, opaque white and woven sack coverage. Exact volume varies with cell angle and depth to opening ratio, so take the roll maker's figure for the specific engraving. | Measured volume on the roll, by the roll maker's method or an in-house volumetric check, not the engraving figure on the end cap | Cells wear and plug. A roll that has lost 30 % of its volume prints as a weak ink at correct viscosity, which invites thinning and makes it worse. |
| Dry deposit | 0.5 to 1 g/m2 on process and tone from a 360 to 500 l/cm roll; 1 to 2 g/m2 on a film solid from a 180 to 300 l/cm roll; 2.5 to 3.5 g/m2 on a kraft or woven sack solid or an opaque white from a 100 to 160 l/cm roll, where holdout is being bought with weight | Weigh a cut area of printed against unprinted substrate on an analytical balance and divide by the area. On kraft and woven PP the basis weight varies from place to place in the same reel by more than the ink weighs, so a single pair is inside its own noise and is not a result: cut at least five printed and five unprinted pairs adjacent to each other at the same position across the web and report the mean with its spread. Stripping the ink with solvent and reweighing to constant weight is an option on smooth film with a one-component ink only. It is not an option on kraft, which loses fibre and sizing to the wipe, nor on woven PP tape, which sheds fines, nor on a cured 250PU film, which is built not to dissolve. | Follows anilox condition and impression. It creeps up as impression is added to recover a weak solid, and the extra film is then what the dryer fails to empty. |
| Dryer profile and extraction | Rising through the tunnel, typically 40 to 50 C at entry to 60 to 80 C at exit, with genuine air turnover and vapour below 25 % of the lower explosive limit. Operation above 25 % and up to 50 % LEL is permitted by EN 1539 only on a dryer designed, certified and documented for it, with a fail-safe continuous LEL monitoring and interlock system of defined response time and a defined purge. That is a machine specification, not a press-floor setting. The line's own safety file says which case applies, and where the file does not say, run below 25 %. | Air temperature read deck by deck at the nozzles, not from the setpoint; extraction volume measured, not fan hours; LEL from the line's own monitor with its calibration in date | Filters load and extraction falls quietly. The setpoint stays where it was while the air going into the tunnel gets more saturated every week, and the first sign is a reel that blocks. |
| Reducer identity | UniFlex-295RD matched to the series; UniFlex-296SL only while the hall is above 35 C; ester-only reducer on the 250PU series, no alcohol once hardener is in | Read the label on the can at the press and log it on the job card at every addition. On toluene-free and ketone-free work, take the reducer from a sealed drum with a certificate of analysis for that batch, never from recovered solvent and never from an unlabelled gantry can. | The slow blend goes in at 11 am when the hall is hot and is still in the pan at 11 pm when it is not, and the reel then goes to the rewind with solvent still in the film. |
Control variables
| Variable | Target | How it is measured | How it drifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two-component dose and pot life | UniFlex-259HD at 3 to 5 % w/w on ink; pot life 6 to 8 h at 30 C and 4 to 5 h at 35 C | Weighed addition on the pan quantity, mixed at the press; pot life taken as the point at which press viscosity has risen 5 s on DIN 4. UniFlex-259HD is an isocyanate adduct and a respiratory and skin sensitiser: weigh and add it with nitrile gloves, eye protection and local extraction at the press, and never where there is no ventilation. | Viscosity creeps, then climbs away in the last hour. Activated ink and moisture-struck hardener generate carbon dioxide, so a sealed container of either can pressurise and burst: never reseal activated ink or a gassed can into a closed drum, vent it and dispose of it as hazardous waste, and keep opened cans away from water and heat. Hardened ink returned to stock gels the drum, so a pan mixed too large is a hazard as well as money in the waste bin. |
| Impression | Kiss impression, set from zero on every deck and marked | Back off until the print drops out, bring on the minimum that gives a full solid, mark the setting and log it | Creeps on through the run as operators chase a weak solid that is really a plugged anilox. It shows as halo on the solid edge and shadow dots filling. |
| Winding tension and reel temperature | Winding tension recorded in N per metre of web width at unwind, print and rewind, with the taper stated as a percentage from core to outside, typically 10 to 25 %. The figure belongs to the film gauge and width and comes from the film supplier's winding recommendation, goes onto the job card at make-ready and is logged at the end of the reel. Reel surface below 30 C at the rewind. | Press tension readout in N/m against the job card; reel hardness checked with a hardness tester or by a consistent hand check at the same three positions across the width; infra-red thermometer on the reel face at the rewind | Rises with speed and with dryer exit temperature. A warm reel wound tight blocks in the core days after the press hall has signed the job off. |
| Press hall humidity and water in the ink | Below about 65 % RH at the press for alcohol-led NC and PA blends; water content of the pan ink within the house limit for the series, typically a few per cent and always below the point at which the resin shocks out | Thermohygrometer at the press, read at the time the fault appears rather than at shift start; Karl Fischer water content to ISO 760 on the pan ink and on the reducer drum, compared with a fresh sealed drum | Climbs through a humid day and through the run, because an open pan of ethanol-led ink takes up water from the hall all shift. The haze arrives in the last two hours of a monsoon run and not at the start, which is why it gets reported as a bad batch. |
| Press hall solvent inventory | On toluene-free and ketone-free work: dedicated and labelled wash solvent, wash tank, hoses, pumps, filters and chambers; every drum in the hall traceable to a certificate of analysis; no recovered or reclaimed solvent on the job | Written inventory walked and signed at make-ready, listing each drum, each gantry can, the wash tank and the recovered solvent tank, with the certificate of analysis reference for each, plus headspace GC-MS on the finished pack where the customer requires evidence | Degrades quietly through shared equipment. A hose or a filter that has been on an aromatic job puts a trace back into the first pan of the clean job that follows it, and no ink certificate will ever explain that result. |
The mechanism
Surface print on polyethylene fails at the film surface, not in the ink. Corona treatment decays, slip amide keeps arriving from inside the polymer, and over-treatment leaves loose oxidised material of its own, so the ink ends up keyed to a weak boundary layer 20 to 50 nm thick that shears away with the print still attached. An ethanol wipe that restores adhesion is evidence of that layer, not proof of which one it is, and in-line corona held between 38 and 44 mN/m at the press is the fix.
02 | 20 faults
Symptom, cause, check, change, confirm. The trap is the move to avoid.
Fault 1 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The solid prints and looks right, but a straight tape pull across it takes ink off, worst on the white and on the heaviest laydown. The failure is usually patchy across the web rather than uniform, and often worst at the edges.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 1 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Tape pull on a solid 24 h after printing at 23 C and 50 % RH showing 95 % or more ink retained, repeated on a retained sample at 7 days, with the dyne reading taken at the print station recorded on the job card.THE TRAP
Tipping adhesion promoter or a dose of hardener into a one-component duct. It does nothing when the failure is at the film surface, it shortens the working life of the whole pan, and it buries the one number nobody took: what the treatment actually was.Fault 2 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The reel runs clean and feels dry at the rewind, then the print picks off onto the back of the film when the reel is unwound at the bag line, or the finished bags stick in the stack after a day on a warm pallet. Worst in the core and where the solid is heaviest.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 2 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Block test print face to reverse face at 40 C for 24 h under 100 g/cm2 with no transfer, and at 50 C where the pack is shipped warm, with residual solvent on a cut reel sample within the house acceptance for the construction and reel surface below 30 C at the rewind.THE TRAP
Turning the dryer up. A hotter flat profile skins the surface faster and locks more solvent underneath it, so the reel blocks worse, and the extra heat is now also distorting a PE web that was running in register.Fault 3 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The cup reading goes up every hour, the operator thins, and by the end of the shift the solid is weaker than the approved draw-down although the viscosity is back on number. Worst on the open pans at the far end of the press.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 3 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Viscosity holding within plus or minus 1 s DIN 4 at 25 C across two hours with automatic dosing running, and solid density within the agreed tolerance of the approved draw-down at both the start and the end of the reel.THE TRAP
Correcting colour with strength or toner while the blend is still drifting. It moves the shade back for twenty minutes and leaves a pan that matches nothing by the end of the run, and the next shift inherits it as their starting ink.Fault 4 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Fine text, reverse type and shadow dots close up within an hour and the solid goes grainy. A ring of dried ink builds on the anilox at the ends, and the print goes light across the width.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 4 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
One hour at running speed with no build on the plate shoulder and no ring at the roll ends, reverse type holding open at the smallest size on the job, and anilox volume measured clean before and after the run.THE TRAP
Flooding the plate by raising viscosity or backing the blade off. It fills the shoulders faster, moves the fill-in out into the solid, and adds ink the dryer then has to take back out at the other end of the press.Fault 5 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The reel passed at the press and the bags were made without incident. Weeks later the customer opens a carton and reports a smell, or the packed product picks up taint. Nothing on the job record shows anything wrong.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 5 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Static headspace GC on the released reel within the agreed house acceptance for that construction, reported in mg/m2 by species, with the unprinted control run alongside and any brand-owner limit applied on top, and the figure recorded against that reel number.THE TRAP
Airing the bags out on the floor for a day, or deciding the reel is fine because nobody in the press hall can smell it. The press hall has been breathing that blend all shift, so the operator's nose is the least sensitive instrument on the floor, and airing a stack only empties the outside of it.Fault 6 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
A UniFlex-250PU job prints well and the film looks right, but the MEK rub or the product resistance test is no better than a one-component ink and sometimes worse. Often the first sign is the customer's own test, not ours.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 6 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
ASTM D5402 MEK double rubs on the heaviest solid at 7 days meeting the count agreed for the job, with the 24 h reading logged alongside so the development between the two is visible on the record.THE TRAP
Doubling the hardener when the first test fails. Excess isocyanate does not crosslink harder or faster. It raises the reaction rate roughly in proportion, so it roughly halves the working life: a 6 to 8 h pan at 30 C becomes 3 to 4 h, climbs away without warning and gels the pan, and the surplus isocyanate can leave a film brittle enough to crack on the fold of the finished bag.Fault 7 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The bag is perfect off the press. After filling, stacking and a lorry journey the print is scuffed grey at the fold and along the top seam, and the brand name on the outer bags of the pallet is unreadable.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 7 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Sutherland rub to ASTM D5264, 4 lb block, 100 cycles at 23 C and 50 % RH with no significant transfer on the varnished print, repeated on a filled and stacked bag after 48 h, with the varnish coat weight recorded.THE TRAP
Stirring wax or slip compound into the ink duct to stop the rubbing. It lowers the surface energy of the printed surface, so the varnish then crawls off the very areas that needed protecting, and any colour trapping onto it beads as well.Fault 8 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Tape pull at 24 h was clean and the job was released. The converter runs the same stock a fortnight later and the ink lifts, or the print flakes along the fold on the finished bag.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 8 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Tape pull on retained samples at 24 h, 7 days and 28 days, all at 95 % or more ink retained, with the dyne reading at print and at 28 days recorded alongside on the same record.THE TRAP
Re-running the job on a fresh reel and calling it fixed. The fresh reel has simply not bloomed yet, the fault returns with the next batch, and by then the ink has been blamed twice and the film has never been measured once.Fault 9 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Round clear spots in the solid, sometimes with a raised rim, and ink pulling away from a point rather than covering it. They repeat across the web but not at the cylinder repeat.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 9 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A 500 mm solid across the full web at running speed with no pinholes visible at a 10x loupe, and a clean bar drawdown of the same pan ink on the same film.THE TRAP
Adding more defoamer. If the craters are silicone repellence, more silicone widens them, and the pan is then unusable for every colour that follows it through the same wash-up.Fault 10 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The solid looks flat and pale against the draw-down, the sheet feels dry to the touch immediately, and the colour shows through on the reverse more than it should. All five causes below fail the same way: the vehicle is drawn into the absorbent multiwall kraft and carries the pigment in with it, so the pigment that should be on the surface scattering light ends up inside the sheet.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 10 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Density on the solid matching the approved draw-down on the customer's own kraft, with dry deposit weighed at 2.5 to 3.5 g/m2 as the mean of five adjacent pairs and no visible strike-through on the reverse of the sheet.THE TRAP
Thinning further to make it transfer. A thinner ink travels deeper into the fibre, so the colour gets weaker still, and the operator thins again. On absorbent stock the correction is anilox volume and holdout, never viscosity downwards.Fault 11 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The overprinted colour breaks up, beads or mottles wherever it crosses the first colour, and is perfectly clean where it sits on bare film. Reverse type in the second colour closes or fills.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 11 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A clean trap across a 100 mm overlap panel with no beading at a 10x loupe, and reverse type in the second colour holding open at the smallest size on the job, held for a full reel.THE TRAP
Drying the first colour harder to stop the mixing. It glazes the surface, so the trap gets worse rather than better, and the extra heat is now also driving the web shrinkage that shows up as register drift on PE.Fault 12 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Fine lines running in the web direction through the solid, in one colour only. They do not move when the plate is changed and they do move when the blade is stepped across.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 12 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A full-width solid at running speed with no lines visible at arm's length and none at a 10x loupe, holding clean for a complete reel.THE TRAP
Winding blade pressure on to wipe the line away. It wears a flat on the blade within minutes, scores the anilox permanently, and converts a twenty minute blade change into a re-engraving and a new roll.Fault 13 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
A dark rim on the leading or trailing edge of solids and type, dots printing visibly larger than the file, and shadow tones filling to solid. The job looks heavy and dirty rather than weak.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 13 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A printed control strip showing dot gain within the agreed curve for that plate and anilox pair, with solids full at the marked kiss impression setting, held at running speed.THE TRAP
Reducing anilox volume to kill the halo while leaving the impression heavy. The solid goes weak, impression gets wound on again to recover it, and the halo comes back with a lighter solid than the job started with.Fault 14 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The filling or bagging line jams, or the opposite happens and the filled stack slides apart on the pallet. The print is correct and the complaint is entirely about handling.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 14 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
ASTM D1894 static and kinetic COF inside the bagging line's stated window, or inside the agreed 0.20 to 0.35 kinetic starting window where the line has none, at 24 h and again at 7 days, measured on retained samples of the customer's own film.THE TRAP
Tipping slip compound into the duct to free a jamming line. It fixes the friction that shift and destroys the trap and the varnish adhesion in the same move, and the next job through that pan inherits the contamination.Fault 15 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The overprint varnish looks glossy in places and dull in others, usually following the heavy ink areas, and the difference between printed and bare film is worse than it was on the proof.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 15 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
ISO 2813 gloss within the agreed band at five points across the web and at the start, middle and end of the reel, on the customer's own film, read at 60 degrees and re-read at 20 or 85 degrees where the 60 degree figure falls outside about 10 to 70 units.THE TRAP
Thinning the varnish to make it flow out. Less solids means less film, so the mottle gets worse, and the coat weight is now also too low to take the scuff on the bagging line, which turns one complaint into two.Fault 16 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The opaque white looks grey against the standard, especially where it goes over a coloured or dark film, and adding more white at the mixer makes no difference at all.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 16 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Contrast ratio over a black and white chart on the customer's own substrate meeting the agreed figure, with the dry deposit weighed as the mean of five adjacent pairs and recorded against the reel.THE TRAP
Adding more white pigment at the mixer, or a toner to correct the grey cast. Where the shortfall is film thickness, more pigment in the same thin film changes nothing measurable, and the toner has now turned the white into a colour that will not match the next batch. Measure the drum density first so you know whether you are short of film or short of pigment.Fault 17 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The bags looked right at delivery. After weeks stacked outdoors the reds and oranges have gone pale and the shade has moved, worst on the sun-facing bags and worst of all in the reduced and tinted areas.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 17 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Filtered xenon arc exposure against the Blue Wool references, with the exposure conditions recorded, showing 7 to 8 in full tone and, at the working reduction, not less than 6 where the full tone rates 8 and not less than 5 where it rates 7, since one to two steps are lost between full tone and a 1:25 reduction. The reduction ratio is recorded alongside the rating and the work is done on the customer's own substrate.THE TRAP
Promising outdoor life for a shade that was matched on the process set because it matched better in the booth. The match is perfect for a fortnight, the complaint arrives at the end of the monsoon, and by then the whole print run is in the field.Fault 18 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The solid goes milky and the gloss drops, worst on the deep shades and on the varnish, worst at the end of a fast run and worst in the monsoon. Fine pinholes usually come with it. The same ink ran clean in February, so it gets reported as a contamination fault or a bad batch.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 18 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Gloss to ISO 2813 back inside the agreed band and a clean bar drawdown of the same pan ink on the same film, with hall RH, hall temperature and the Karl Fischer water content of the pan recorded against the reel.THE TRAP
Chasing it with a fresh drum of ink. The water is arriving from the hall, the open pan and the reducer, so the new drum blushes within the hour and the job is two drums down with the hall unchanged. Measure the water before you change the ink.Fault 19 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The ink was supplied as a toluene-free and ketone-free grade and the customer's own headspace GC on the finished pack reports toluene or MEK at a few mg/m2. Nothing on the ink certificate explains it and the press log shows the correct grade in the pan.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 19 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Headspace GC-MS on the finished pack showing no toluene and no ketone above the stated reporting limit of the method in mg/m2, with the unprinted control run alongside and the signed solvent inventory for that shift on the record.THE TRAP
Treating a toluene-free ink as a toluene-free pack. The ink is a formulation; the pack is a construction printed in a hall with its own solvent inventory, its own wash-up and its own thinner supply. An ink certificate on its own answers none of that, and a customer is right to ask for the pack to be tested rather than the drum.Fault 20 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The print is solid in places and broken in others in a pattern that follows the weave, worst over the tape overlaps and at the selvedge. Reverse type closes on one part of the width and prints thin on another. On tubular fabric the print is sometimes found on the wrong face, and only after conversion.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 20 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A full-width fabric solid at running speed with the weave covered and no break-up at the overlaps at a 10x loupe, reverse type open at the agreed minimum size, and the dyne reading on the printed face recorded at the print station.THE TRAP
Winding impression on to force the ink into the weave. It flattens the tape, spreads the image, prints a halo at every overlap and can emboss the weave into the plate on a thin fabric. The answer is film weight from a coarser anilox and a softer plate, not pressure.03
One page to work from, and the methods behind every number.
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Ink lifts with tape on PE | Dyne the reel at the station, edges included | In-line corona to 38 to 42 mN/m, not past 44 |
| Adhesion fine at press, gone in store | Ethanol wipe and re-test the same reel | Low-slip film, or carry slip in the varnish |
| Reel blocks, face to back | Reel surface temperature and tension in N/m | Rising dryer profile and lower tension |
| Solvent smell at the customer | Headspace GC on core sample plus plain film control | Extraction and dwell, before the blend |
| Viscosity climbs all shift | Ink temperature in the tray, cup at 25 C | Cover the pans, dose with 295RD only |
| Plate fills in, dried ring at the roll ends | Chamber end seals and chamber fill across the width | Replace the seals, then slow the blend with 296SL |
| 2K PU fails resistance | Look in the reducer can for alcohol | Ester-only reducer, dump the pan |
| Print rubs off the filled sack | Varnish coat weight, five adjacent cut pairs | 290OG at 2 to 3 g/m2 dry on sack |
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Pinholes and fisheyes | Bar drawdown of the pan ink on clean film, first | Drop pump speed, seal the suction, stop the splash |
| Weak chalky colour on kraft | Anilox volume against 14 to 25 cm3/m2 at 100 to 160 l/cm | 270KS on a coarser roll at 20 to 22 s |
| Second colour will not trap | Dyne the printed first-down solid | Balance interdeck, take slip out of the ink |
| Streaks down the solid | Step the blade and see if the line moves | Change the blade, filter the return |
| Halo and heavy dot gain | Reset impression to kiss from zero | Match anilox volume and ruling to the plate |
| Bags jam or the pallet slides | COF to ASTM D1894 at 24 h and 7 days | Set the slip in the varnish to the line's window |
| Gloss patchy, varnish mottles | Gloss at 60 degrees, five points across the web | Dry the ink before the varnish, raise coat weight |
| White prints grey | Drum density against 1.35 to 1.6 kg/l, then dry deposit | Coarser anilox or a double hit, stop thinning |
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Shade faded in the yard | Pigment index numbers on the TDS for that shade | Rebuild on individually selected 7 to 8 grades |
| Print blushes and goes hazy | Hall RH now, and Karl Fischer water on the pan | Close the drums and cover the pans; then 296SL |
| Toluene or ketone on a declared-free job | GC the pack and the plain film control together | Dedicate the wash-up, hoses, pumps and filters |
| Print breaks up on woven fabric | Which face is treated and which becomes the outside | 280WP on 100 to 160 l/cm, softer plate and tape |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Flow cup viscosity | DIN 4 mm flow cup to DIN 53211, or the ISO 2431 4 mm cup where stated explicitly | The efflux time of the ink as it will run. The DIN 4 and ISO 2431 4 mm cups are different geometries, with different reservoirs and orifice lengths, and they do not give the same seconds on the same ink, so the cup is named with every figure and the two are never interchanged. Supply 50 plus or minus 10 s for process and line shades, 70 plus or minus 15 s for opaque white and sack solids, 30 plus or minus 5 s for varnishes. Press 16 to 22 s depending on anilox. Sample and cup both at 25 plus or minus 1 C, a house condition set for our press halls rather than the 23 C of ISO 2431 or the 20 C of DIN 53211, so the temperature is quoted with the figure. Orifice checked against a calibration oil or a certified reference cup on a stated interval. |
| Wetting tension | ISO 8296 test liquids, or ASTM D2578 in the laboratory | Surface energy of the substrate at the moment of printing. 38 mN/m minimum on corona-treated PE and woven PP for surface print, 40 to 44 mN/m where the print will be laminated, and not chased above about 44 because over-treatment builds its own weak boundary layer. Read on the reel about to run, at three points across the width and at both edges. The standard liquids are formamide and 2-ethoxyethanol mixtures and both components are reproductive toxicants absorbed through the skin: nitrile gloves, no skin contact, cap immediately, swabs to solvent waste, and prefer a formamide-free set where one is qualified against ISO 8296. Keep the set in date, because liquids that have aged or taken up water read the film low. |
| Tape adhesion, straight pull | In-house method using 3M 610 or equivalent tape | Percentage of ink retained after a firm straight pull across a solid, 24 h after printing at 23 C and 50 % RH. Acceptance 95 % or more, repeated at 7 and 28 days on retained samples. ISO 2409 cross-cut is deliberately not used on a 2 um film on PE, because the blade cuts the substrate. |
| Solvent rub resistance | ASTM D5402, MEK double rubs | Degree of crosslink on a two-component UniFlex-250PU film. Read on the heaviest solid at 24 h and again at 7 days, same pad and same load, because the film develops over 5 to 7 days at 25 C. The difference between the two readings is the evidence that the hardener worked. |
| Rub and scuff resistance | Sutherland rub to ASTM D5264, 4 lb block, 100 cycles print to print | Abrasion resistance of the finished surface at 23 C and 50 % RH, with the receptor and the print mounted as the method specifies and the result reported both as transfer to the receptor and as change to the printed surface. A varnished surface print typically shows no significant transfer at 100 cycles; an unvarnished one starts to transfer at 25 to 50. Repeat on a filled bag, because a cut sample is not a loaded sack. TAPPI T 830 uses the same tester but is written for containerboard and is not interchangeable with D5264 on film or on woven tape. |
| Coefficient of friction | ASTM D1894 | Static and kinetic friction of the finished surface, print to print and print to reverse, at 23 C and 50 % RH. Measured at 24 h and again at 7 days, because the film's own slip additive keeps arriving at the surface. The acceptance is the bagging line's own working window. Where the line cannot state one, start from kinetic COF of about 0.20 to 0.35 print to print, since below about 0.15 a stacked pallet loses its interlock and above about 0.4 the bags drag on chutes and grippers, then narrow it on a trial and record the agreed window. |
| Gloss | ISO 2813, 60 degree geometry as the reference | Gloss of the overprint varnish, read at five points across the web and at the start, middle and end of the reel, on printed and unprinted areas separately. Re-read at 20 degrees where the 60 degree value exceeds about 70 gloss units, as on UniFlex-290OG, and at 85 degrees where it falls below about 10, as on UniFlex-291OM matt; 60 degrees does not discriminate outside that middle range, which is where both of our varnishes sit. It is the only reliable way to separate a real mottle from press-hall lighting. |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Light fastness | Filtered xenon arc exposure, rated against the ISO 105-B02 blue wool references 1 to 8 | Outdoor life of the shade. A blue wool rating means nothing without the exposure conditions attached, so the irradiance, the filter, the black standard temperature and the relative humidity are stated with every rating, and the samples are exposed alongside the blue wool references on the same rack. Sack and cement bag shades are built on grades rating 7 to 8 in full tone, selected by pigment index number rather than by family, and a 1:25 reduction costs one to two steps. Rated on the full tone and on the working reduction, on the customer's own substrate, unvarnished unless the varnish is specified. |
| Residual solvent | Static headspace gas chromatography on a cut sample of the finished reel | Total and individual retained solvent, which is what causes odour, taint and blocking. Reported in mg/m2 against prepared standards and not as area percent, with the conditioning stated, typically 30 to 60 min at 80 to 120 C in a sealed vial. As an order of magnitude to judge a first result against: total retained solvent of the order of 5 mg/m2 or less on food-related constructions and 10 to 20 mg/m2 on non-food sacks, with any individual species limit set by the brand owner applied on top. Sample from the core as well as the outside, and run an unprinted control from the same reel. The binding acceptance belongs to the construction, the line speed and the dryer, so it is confirmed on the customer's own job before it becomes a specification. |
| Water content of the ink | Karl Fischer titration to ISO 760 | Water carried in an alcohol-led NC or PA blend, run on the pan ink and on the reducer drum and compared against a fresh sealed drum. It is the one measurement that separates a monsoon blush from a contamination fault, and it is taken at the time the haze appears rather than at shift start, because an open pan takes up water all shift. The house limit belongs to the series and is a few per cent at most; past it the resin shocks out and the pan is finished. |
| Solvent identity in the finished pack | Static headspace GC-MS on the finished pack, with an unprinted control from the same reel | Identification and quantification of individual species in mg/m2 against prepared standards, with the reporting limit of the method stated. It is how a toluene-free or ketone-free formulation statement is supported on a real pack, and the plain film control is what separates the ink from the substrate, the adhesive and the store. The statement we make is about the formulation we supply; what is in the pack belongs to the construction and to the press hall, and is assessed on the customer's own pack on request. |
When the press-floor fixes have not worked