Troubleshooting guide
Press-floor fault finding for UV laminating, cold-foil and pressure-sensitive adhesives: cure through the substrate or through the foil carrier, oxygen inhibition at a free surface, bond development, open time and shrinkage stress.
Uniform Industries · Greater Noida, India · ufindustries.com
Figures are typical for the class and carry their test method. The values that govern a supply are those on the Technical Data Sheet for the grade.
Before you start
Work down the page. Cheap checks before expensive ones, and measure before you change anything.
01
What happens, in order, and the one variable held at each step.
The process
Control variables
| Variable | Target | How it is measured | How it drifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adhesive coat weight | 1.5 to 3.0 g/m2 for cold foil, 2.0 to 5.0 g/m2 for film lamination, typical for this class. Agreed per construction and written on the job ticket, not carried across from another job. | Cut at least five coated and uncoated pairs adjacent on the same web at the same cross-web position, weigh on a four-place balance, average them and quote the spread. The substrate swamps the signal on a single pair: 100 cm2 of 20 micron BOPP weighs about 180 mg against roughly 20 mg of adhesive at 2 g/m2, and film basis weight varies by several per cent. On board it is worse, 100 cm2 of 250 g/m2 board weighs about 2.5 g. For a definitive figure take a coated specimen from before the lamp, weigh it, wash the uncured adhesive off that same specimen with acetone, dry and reweigh. Cross-check against anilox volume and expected transfer. | Falls through the run as anilox cells plug or the screen blinds. It shows as foil pinholing and a slow loss of bond rather than a step change, which is why it is usually found late. A 10 per cent start-to-end tolerance is only meaningful once the figure is an average of several pairs or a wash-off result. |
| Delivered UV dose at the adhesive | Grade and construction specific, always stated with the radiometer band and head. As an indicative order of magnitude, film lamination cured through clear film commonly needs of the order of 100 to 300 mJ/cm2 at the adhesive; cold foil cured through the carrier commonly sits lower. Take the window from the adhesive supplier for that grade, verify it on the construction, and log it with the band. A dose figure without a band is not a specification. | Band-matched radiometer run through the cure station at production speed with the production film, or the production foil carrier, taped over the sensor window. A standard radiometer puck is 10 to 12 mm thick and rigid and will not pass a closed laminating or foil nip, so run it with the nip open, carry the sensor on the web past the lamp, or use a thin strip-type radiometer where the geometry will not clear a puck. A reading on the open web with nothing over the sensor is not this number. | Falls with lamp hours, window or quartz contamination and reflector condition, and halves when speed doubles. Mercury loses short wave first while a broadband meter still reads acceptably. |
| Peak irradiance at the web | Peak irradiance is W/cm2 in the band the head covers. A 385 to 405 nm LED array rated 8 to 16 W/cm2 at its emitting window will read lower at the working distance; record what the meter reads at the web and treat the window figure as a specification, not a measurement. A medium-pressure mercury lamp rated 120 to 200 W/cm of arc length typically gives of the order of 1 to 4 W/cm2 at the web, depending on reflector, focus and band. Never quote W/cm as an irradiance at the web: it is arc power per unit arc length and no radiometer reads it. | Radiometer peak reading taken at the actual working distance, not at the emitting window, with the band declared. | Falls sharply with lamp-to-web distance and with any web flutter or lift at the cure station; a loose web reads lower at the edges than at the centre. Irradiance, not dose, is what beats oxygen inhibition at a free surface. |
| Film and foil carrier UV transmission at the cure wavelength | Stated per film lot and per foil lot. Clear BOPP and clear PET are typically 70 to 90 per cent at 395 nm; a UV-blocked PET can be under 10 per cent at 365 nm. A cold foil carrier is normally clear PET of 12 to 23 micron, but its transmission is still a lot property and is measured, not assumed. | UV-Vis transmission scan from 300 to 420 nm on the reel about to be run, and the supplier spectrum for the lot. Read it in the band the radiometer reads. | Changes between lots and suppliers without notice, usually when a UV blocker, a slip package or a filler level is changed. A change of film or foil lot is one of the most frequent and most easily missed causes of a lost bond, because nothing on the press changes when it happens. |
| Adhesive temperature and viscosity | Held within 2 C of the agreed running temperature, typically 22 to 30 C at the tray or chamber. | Rotational viscometer at the stated running temperature and a stated shear rate, with spindle and speed recorded so the reading is reproducible. Do not use a flow cup on these grades: ISO 2431 is a flow cup method for Newtonian and near-Newtonian liquids, and UV laminating and cold-foil adhesives are shear thinning, so a cup time does not convert to a viscosity and does not track what the anilox sees. | Rises overnight as the tray cools and falls as press heat builds through a shift. Transfer, coat weight and foil pinholing follow it directly. |
| Substrate surface energy | 38 mN/m minimum on polyolefin, 42 mN/m preferred where the pack will be handled or filled hot. | ASTM D2578 wetting tension, dyne pens or ISO 8296 test inks, on the reel as it is at the press. Handle the inks with gloves and in extraction; the standard formulations contain formamide and 2-ethoxyethanol, both reproductive toxins. | Corona treatment decays over weeks in store, and slip and antiblock additives bloom to the surface of PE and PP. Reels treated to 42 mN/m at the film plant frequently read 34 mN/m at the press. |
| Web tension at the nip | Set each web on its own cross-section, not by feel or by rank. A working range of roughly 2 to 8 N per 100 mm of width on 12 micron PET, and proportionally more on a thicker or heavier base; the underlying rule of thumb is about 0.25 to 1.0 lb per inch of width per mil of caliper. Run each web at the lower end of its own range, match the two webs on that basis rather than on absolute newtons, and record both figures on the job ticket. | Load cell reading on the running web, confirmed with a hand tension meter at the unwind and at the nip, with caliper and width recorded alongside so the figure can be compared between jobs. | Rises as the unwind reel gets small if taper is not set, so the last third of a reel laminates under different conditions from the first third. |
Control variables
| Variable | Target | How it is measured | How it drifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nip pressure and evenness | Even across the full width, set to the construction. Uneven nip is a wet-out fault long before it is a bond fault. | Full-width nip impression strip, or pressure-sensitive film across the web. | Loses evenness as the rubber roller wears at the edges or grows at the centre with heat; edge bubbles and centre squeeze-out are the visible result. |
| Rewind tension and taper | Taper of 20 to 40 per cent from core to full reel is typical for a laminate that is still developing bond. | Build the hardness profile during winding: take reel hardness readings at several diameters as the reel grows, and across the width at each diameter, then plot hardness against diameter. That curve is the taper. On a finished reel only the outer surface is accessible, so readings there confirm the width profile, not the taper. | Wound-in pressure builds through the reel, so tunnels and curl appear near the core first and are absent from the sample cut at the end of the run. |
| Anilox or screen specification for the target coat weight | Chosen for the coat weight, not inherited from the last job. The cell volume must deliver the specified g/m2 at the transfer efficiency of that press, plate and adhesive. A ruling too coarse for the coat weight lays a ribbed film and shows screen mark in the foil; one too fine will not release a viscous adhesive. | Cell volume measurement on the anilox, and a coat weight trial at the running temperature on the production substrate before the anilox is accepted for the job. | Effective volume falls as cells plug or as the land wears. Record the anilox specification and the date of its last chemical clean on the job ticket. |
| Incoming adhesive lot check | Every lot checked on receipt against the retained reference before it goes on the press: viscosity at a stated temperature and shear rate, colour, and cure response on a draw-down at a stated dose. | Rotational viscometer at the stated temperature and shear rate; a draw-down at the specified coat weight cured at a logged dose and assessed by solvent rub and by tack against the reference. | Lot to lot variation is small but it is not zero, and material stored warm or held past its date behaves differently. Without this check every fault in this document gets blamed on the press. |
| Static on the web | Low enough that the foil or the film does not flutter at the applicator or at the strip point and does not pull dust into the adhesive film. Treat static as a control, not as weather. | Static field meter reading at the unwind, at the applicator and at the strip bar with the press at speed, with pressroom relative humidity recorded at the same time. | Rises as humidity falls, so a job that ran in summer is a different job in a dry winter pressroom. Ionising bars lose output as the emitter pins foul, and nobody notices until the foil starts to speck. |
| Guarding, extraction and personal protection at the UV stations | Every UV station fully guarded with interlocks working, extraction running on medium-pressure mercury, no unshielded light path onto an operator position, and nitrile gloves and eye protection worn for every adhesive handling task. | Interlock function check and guard inspection on the shift check sheet; extraction flow verified; UV-sensitive indicator paper or photochromic strips used to find light leaks rather than looking for them by eye. | Guards come off for a make-ready and do not go back, interlocks get defeated and extraction gets throttled. Medium-pressure mercury makes ozone and puts out enough UV to cause photokeratitis and skin erythema in seconds at press distance; uncured acrylates are skin sensitisers, and sensitisation does not reverse. |
The mechanism
A UV laminating adhesive is cured through the incoming film, and a cold foil adhesive is usually cured through the foil carrier. Either way the number that matters is not what the lamp is set to but what survives the film and reaches the interface against the substrate. That interface cures last, and it is where the bond is made.
02 | 20 faults
Symptom, cause, check, change, confirm. The trap is the move to avoid.
Fault 1 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The reel laminates cleanly, looks right at the rewind and passes a hand pull at the machine. Next morning the two webs strip apart by hand, often with adhesive left on both faces, and the whole run is in question.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 1 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
15 mm peel at 24 h and again at 7 days on the production film, meeting the agreed value for that construction with a consistent failure mode. Bond still climbing at 24 h is normal; bond that falls between 24 h and 7 days is not. Under-cure with residual mobile monomer is the most likely cause of a falling bond, but slip and antiblock migrating to the interface, residual cure stress and plasticising from the fill all do the same thing, so read the failure mode and check both dose and the film additive package before concluding.THE TRAP
Slowing the press and calling it solved. Slowing does raise dose, but it does not raise peak irradiance and it will not push a wavelength through a film that blocks it, so the job now runs slowly and still fails. Measure film transmission before touching the speed setting.Fault 2 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The laminate holds across open areas but lifts with a fingernail over dense black, opaque white or heavy solids. The map of the failure is the map of the print.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 2 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
24 h peel over the heaviest solid within 20 per cent of the peel over the unprinted area on the same reel, with the same failure mode in both.THE TRAP
Raising adhesive coat weight to bridge the weak area. A thicker layer on a release surface still releases, and the extra adhesive volume adds shrinkage stress that starts tunnelling two days later.Fault 3 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Straight or wandering air channels running in the machine direction, absent at the rewind and obvious the next morning. Worst near the core, and the reel looks perfect at the outside where the sample was cut.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 3 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A full production reel, not a sample roll, free of channels at 24 h and again at 72 h, inspected at the core as well as the outside.THE TRAP
Winding harder to pull the tunnels flat. It stores more stress in the reel and the channels come back larger when the reel is relaxed or unwound at the converter.Fault 4 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Sheets or die-cut labels bow towards one face, or the slit reel will not lie flat. Usually worse on thin, unbalanced constructions and worse again in a dry store.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 4 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Corner rise under the agreed limit on a 100 mm square at 24 h after conditioning, measured on material from the core and the outside of the reel.THE TRAP
Reverse-bending or back-rolling the reel to take the curl out. It relaxes for a few hours and returns, and it can start delamination at the same time.Fault 5 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The foil image shows small unfoiled specks, broken fine line and type, or whole areas that never transfer. Solids look grey or mottled rather than bright.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 5 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A foiled solid with no visible pinholing at 10x magnification, and reproducible gloss readings to ISO 2813 at a stated angle, or L star by spectrophotometer, across the width at the start, middle and end of the run. Do not use a densitometer on a metallised surface: it assumes a diffusely reflecting print and a specular metal returns a figure that depends on geometry rather than on foil coverage. If a density figure is contractually required, state the method and status used and treat it as a relative check only.THE TRAP
Winding the nip pressure up to force transfer. It squeezes the adhesive out at the edges of the image, gives ragged foil edges and halo, and wears the roller so the next job starts worse.Fault 6 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The foil is down across the image but lifts at the edges, at die cuts and at creases, sometimes only after the job has been converted or handled.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 6 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
No lift at the image edge after a tape pull at 24 h, and no lift on a creased and folded sample of the production board, tested along and across the grain.THE TRAP
Adding adhesive coat weight when the foil flags. The cause is nearly always the release and cure relationship, and more adhesive adds squeeze-out and shrinkage at the exact edge that is already lifting.Fault 7 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Small round voids in the adhesive, visible as unfoiled dots or as clear spots and weak patches in a laminate, sometimes with a raised rim. Often they repeat in the same place on the web.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 7 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A 300 mm foiled or laminated solid free of craters at 10x, with the substrate reading at or above 38 mN/m at the point of coating.THE TRAP
Raising coat weight to fill the craters. The contaminant is still there and the crater simply becomes a larger, deeper one; it also hides the source so it returns on the next job.Fault 8 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The adhesive thickens, strings, or sets solid in the chamber, tray, pump lines or anilox cells, sometimes warm to the touch. The press can lose a station in minutes and the anilox may not recover.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 8 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Viscosity at the running temperature unchanged over a four-hour run, measured at start and end on the same instrument at the same shear rate, and a clean anilox cell count after wash-up.THE TRAP
Thinning gelled adhesive with monomer or solvent to keep running. The reaction is not reversible; the material is scrap, and running it puts partly polymerised gel through the anilox and ruins it. Sealing it into a drum to deal with later is worse again.Fault 9 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The laminate is sound at set-up speed and steadily worse at running speed. Nothing else changed, and slowing down cures it, so the crew runs the job slowly.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 9 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
24 h peel at full production speed equal to the peel at set-up speed within 15 per cent, with delivered dose logged at that speed with the band stated.THE TRAP
Running the job slowly and treating it as solved. The dose window has not been established, the next shift will speed up, and the same reel will come back from the converter.Fault 10 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Fine silvery speckle or visible bubbles between the webs, often stronger at one edge or in a band. The laminate is optically poor even where the bond is acceptable.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 10 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
No visible silvering in a 500 mm length viewed against a light box, and, where the laminate is clear, transmission haze to ASTM D1003 or ISO 14782 within the agreed range across the full width. Silvering is an internal haze, so haze is the number that tracks it; gloss to ISO 2813 is a surface measurement and will not see it.THE TRAP
Adding heat at the nip to chase the bubbles out. It brings the adhesive nearer its gel point before cure, shortens the working window and can start gelling in the chamber.Fault 11 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The film looks patchy, ribbed or screen-marked, foil brightness and laminate appearance vary across the width, and the coat weight measured at the end of the run is below the figure measured at the start. The press and the web downstream get progressively dirtier.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 11 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Coat weight at the end of the run within 10 per cent of the figure at the start, each figure being the average of at least five coated and uncoated pairs, with the same value measured at both edges and at the centre.THE TRAP
Correcting a falling coat weight with more impression or more blade pressure. It masks the anilox problem for an hour, damages the plate, the blade and the anilox land, and the real coat weight keeps falling underneath.Fault 12 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Ink or varnish printed over the foil scratches off, rubs at the fold or tapes off cleanly, while the same ink is sound on the unfoiled board alongside.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 12 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
No removal on a tape pull over the foil at 24 h, compared directly against the same tape pull on the adjacent unfoiled board, with 30 MEK double rubs passed on the same area.THE TRAP
Blaming the overprint ink and trying three more inks. The usual causes are the foil printable face and the dose on a reflective surface, and until those are settled every ink will give the same result.Fault 13 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Adhesive squeezes at the die cut, the matrix breaks or webs, the die and the cutting cylinder build up, and labels block on the reel at the slit edge.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 13 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Full matrix strip at production speed on a reel converted at 24 h, with a clean cut edge at 10x and no adhesive build-up on the die or the anvil after a full reel, or at minimum 10 000 impressions at production speed, with the die inspected under magnification at the end.THE TRAP
Increasing die pressure when the matrix breaks. It cuts into the liner, extrudes more adhesive at the edge and turns a cure problem into a liner problem as well.Fault 14 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Labels sit down but lift at the edge on a curved pack, or come away from a textured or low-energy surface within a day. Loop tack feels dead compared with the approved sample.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 14 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
180 degree peel by FINAT FTM 1 and loop tack by FINAT FTM 9 at 24 h on the customer own face material and application surface, meeting the agreed values, together with shear or holding power by FINAT FTM 8 still within specification, and the dose logged at the figure that produced all three. Tack and shear move in opposite directions with dose, so confirm both ends or you will trade this fault for the matrix-stripping fault on the same reel.THE TRAP
Adding dose because the label is failing. Under-cure and over-cure both give poor labels, and adding dose to an over-cured adhesive removes the last of the tack.Fault 15 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The finished reel or the filled pack smells of acrylate, and the complaint often arrives from the filler rather than from the converter. Nothing was wrong at the press.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 15 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Sensory result at 24 h at or below the agreed reference level by the stated method and panel, supported by residual monomer and photoinitiator figures, and, where the pack is food contact, by a migration assessment on the finished structure under the stated contact conditions. No conformity statement is made for the adhesive on its own.THE TRAP
Airing the reels off in a warm store. Warming a wound reel drives mobile species from one face onto the other, so the odour redistributes into the food-contact face instead of leaving.Fault 16 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Transfer is good at the applicator and poor at the nip, the film looks dull or set on the web, and the fault gets worse whenever the press slows or stops.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 16 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Full wet-out and specified 24 h peel on material laminated immediately after a two-minute press stop, matched against material laminated in steady running, with no heat distortion at the stop mark.THE TRAP
Raising coat weight so there is more wet adhesive at the nip. It buys a few metres, deepens the skin, and adds shrinkage stress to a laminate that is already poorly wetted.Fault 17 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The laminate passes at 24 h and fails weeks later, or delaminates at the seal jaw on the filling line, or fails after the pack is filled with an oily or surfactant product.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 17 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Peel on the finished construction at 24 h, 7 days and after 7 days at 50 C, all meeting the agreed value, plus a peel and a seal strength to ASTM F88 on a pack filled with the actual product and held at the real storage condition. Where a shelf life is being claimed, run real-time ageing on the finished construction in parallel; an accelerated result is a screen.THE TRAP
Signing the job off on the 24 h peel alone. This category most expensive failures all pass at 24 h, which is exactly why the ageing point exists.Fault 18 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The adhesive is hard under the film or under the foil but soft, tacky or smeary wherever it was exposed to air at cure: outside the foil image, at bleed and squeeze-out, at the web edge beyond the second film, and on any station that cures the adhesive with nothing over it. The reel blocks, the slit edge glues, and rollers downstream pick up adhesive.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 18 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
No tack difference at 24 h between adhesive cured in the open and adhesive cured under the covering web, judged by solvent rub and by thumb tack, and a full reel that unwinds at 24 h with no blocking at the slit edge and no transfer onto a clean roller.THE TRAP
Slowing the press to beat a tacky surface. Oxygen inhibition is an irradiance and atmosphere problem, so more time at the same low irradiance simply lets more oxygen diffuse in and the surface stays soft.Fault 19 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The foil image is doubled or ghosted, fine slivers of foil come away at the strip bar and blow around the press, the carrier web breaks, or foil re-lays onto the web after it has been stripped. Often intermittent and worse at speed.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 19 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A full reel foiled with a clean stripped carrier, no slivering at the strip bar, no doubling at 10x, and a tape pull at 24 h with no lift at the image edge.THE TRAP
Raising carrier tension to stop the foil re-laying. It raises the peel force at the strip point, pulls foil out of fine line and type, and puts the carrier nearer a break.Fault 20 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The finished reel is hard to unwind, layers stick, adhesive shows as a bead at the slit edge, roll edges gum up the converter machine, or the roll telescopes in store. Usually found by the converter and not at the press.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 20 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A full production reel unwinding cleanly at 24 h and again at 7 days, checked at the core and the outside, with no adhesive bead visible at the slit edge at 10x and no transfer onto a clean roller.THE TRAP
Slitting the glued edge off and re-reeling. It removes the evidence and the bead returns on the next reel, because the adhesive image is still wider than the web that covers it.03
One page to work from, and the methods behind every number.
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Laminate peels apart at 24 h | Job docket against the last good run, then delivered dose under the production film, band stated | Raise irradiance, or move to a wavelength the film transmits |
| Bond poor only over heavy solids | 30 MEK double rubs (ASTM D5402) on the print before lamination | Cure the print, and remove press-added slip from those colours |
| Tunnels and channels in the reel | Both unwind tensions in N per 100 mm of width, and the rewind taper | Drop the thinner web to the bottom of its own range, set 20 to 40 per cent taper |
| Laminate or label curls | Coat weight by cut-area weighing against the specified range | Reduce coat weight to the bottom of the range |
| Foil transfer patchy or pinholed | Coat weight and anilox cell condition under magnification | Restore coat weight to 1.5 to 3.0 g/m2 by anilox, not by pressure |
| Foil lifts at the edges | Cure state where the carrier strips, then the same adhesive on another foil | Set lamp and lamp-to-strip distance to the logged figures, reduce coat weight |
| Foil doubles or slivers at the strip bar | Strip angle, carrier tension and lamp-to-strip distance as set | Reset to the press specification and log them on the job ticket |
| Craters and fisheyes | Surface energy at the point of coating, and the defect repeat distance | Find and remove the silicone source, then corona treat in line |
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Adhesive gelling in the chamber | Light leaks by indicator paper, and temperature at tray, pump and return | Black out the applicator, cool the path, keep an air headspace |
| Bond falls as speed rises | Dose at set-up speed and at running speed, both logged with the band | Add irradiance or lamp power; stop web flutter at the cure station |
| Bubbles and silvering | Full-width nip impression strip | Correct roller wear, even up nip pressure, then raise coat weight |
| Coat weight drifting through the run | Averaged cut-area weighing at start, middle and end; anilox cell volume | Clean the anilox and hold adhesive temperature within 2 C |
| Overprint lifts off the cold foil | Tape pull on the foil against the same pull on the board alongside | Specify a foil with a printable receptive top coat |
| PSA oozes, matrix will not strip | Delivered dose, then coat weight, then liner caliper | Raise dose into the window and convert at 24 h, not at the press |
| PSA tack and peel too low | Loop tack and 180 degree peel on the customer face and surface | Bring dose down into the window; confirm shear has not gone with it |
| Adhesive tacky outside the image or at the web edge | Peak irradiance in W/cm2 at that station, and how far the image runs out | Raise irradiance or cover the surface; trim the image inside the web |
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Reel blocks or the slit edge glues | Slit edge at 10x for an adhesive bead, and rewind tension and taper | Trim the adhesive image inside the covering web, reduce rewind tension |
| Adhesive skins before the nip | Indicator paper along the open web path, and time to nip against open time | Shield the open web path and shutter the lamps on a stop |
| Odour or taint in the finished pack | Delivered dose through the production film, then sensory testing to a stated method | Raise dose into the window, or move to a wavelength the film transmits |
| Bond falls after ageing, fill or at the seal jaw | Peel at 7 days and after 7 days at 50 C on the real construction | Re-qualify the grade against the fill and the seal condition, with margin |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Laminate bond peel | Ply adhesion to ASTM F904, or T-peel to ASTM D1876 or ISO 11339, with the geometry fixed for that construction | The release number for a laminating adhesive, taken at 24 h and at 7 days on the production construction. Fix the geometry and do not swap between tests: T-peel and 180 degree peel load the interface differently and their values are not comparable on the same laminate. State strip width, 15 mm or 25 mm, crosshead speed, 300 mm/min unless the standard specifies otherwise, peel angle and conditioning with every result. Acceptance is agreed per construction, and the failure mode matters as much as the value, since adhesive on both faces indicates cure and a clean face indicates the interface. |
| Peel adhesion, pressure sensitive | FINAT FTM 1, 180 degrees at 300 mm/min | Final peel of a UV pressure-sensitive construction, on the customer own face material and application surface. Reported at 20 min, 24 h and 72 h because peel builds; a 20 min figure is not the specification. |
| Loop tack | FINAT FTM 9 | Immediate grab at the moment of application, which is what decides whether a label sits down on the line. Falls at both ends of the dose window, so it is read alongside the radiometer figure and not on its own. |
| Shear, holding power | FINAT FTM 8 | The other half of the pressure-sensitive balance. Tack and shear move in opposite directions with dose, so a change made to recover tack is only confirmed once shear is shown to be still in specification. Without this figure a tack fault gets traded for a die-cutting fault. |
| Release force, liner | FINAT low-speed release method, FTM 3 | Release of the face and adhesive from the liner, against the retained reference for that liner lot. A liner whose release or silicone cure is off shows as lost tack or as a broken matrix, and both look like adhesive faults until this is measured. |
| Solvent rub | ASTM D5402, MEK double rubs | Cure state of the print that the adhesive has to key to, and of a draw-down of the adhesive itself where it is accessible. 30 double rubs without softening is the usual pass for print under a laminate. It cannot be run on adhesive already covered by a film. MEK is highly flammable and has an occupational exposure limit, so run it in extraction, with gloves, away from any UV station. |
| Tape pull adhesion | Stated tape, applied with a defined roller and pulled at 180 degrees, compared against a control area | Adhesion of print on film, of a cold foil image, and of an overprint over foil. The comparison is the diagnosis, so pull on the foil and on the adjacent unfoiled board together. A cross-cut to ISO 2409 is the right method for a coating on a substrate the blade can score without cutting through, which is print or varnish on board; it is not right on a 12 to 20 micron film, nor on a foil image where the blade passes through a metal layer tens of nanometres thick into the substrate and the classification reports substrate damage. |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Wetting tension | ASTM D2578, dyne pens or ISO 8296 test inks | Surface energy of the substrate at the point of coating, and of the surface a pressure-sensitive label will be applied to. 38 mN/m is the practical floor on polyolefin; measure on the reel at the press, not on the certificate. The standard ink formulations contain formamide and 2-ethoxyethanol, both reproductive toxins, so gloves and extraction. |
| UV radiometry | Band-matched radiometer, wavelength band declared with every reading | Delivered dose in mJ/cm2 and peak irradiance in W/cm2 at the adhesive, taken at production speed with the production film or foil carrier over the sensor. Match the head to the source: a UV-A head, 320 to 390 nm, for a 385 nm array, a UV-V head, 395 to 445 nm, for a 395 or 405 nm array, and a full multi-band head for a mercury lamp. A UV-A head will badly under-read a 405 nm array. The same lamp reads two to three times differently on two different bands, so a dose in mJ/cm2 without a band is not a number. A standard puck will not pass a closed nip, so run with the nip open, carry the sensor on the web, or use a thin strip-type instrument. |
| UV transmission of the film and the foil carrier | UV-Vis transmission scan from 300 to 420 nm on the reel to be run | The percentage of the cure wavelength that actually reaches the adhesive. Clear BOPP and PET are typically 70 to 90 per cent at 395 nm; a UV-blocked PET can be under 10 per cent at 365 nm. Read it in the same band the radiometer reads. A change of film or foil lot is one of the most frequent and most easily missed causes of a lost bond, because nothing on the press changes when it happens. |
| Coat weight by weighing | Cut-area weighing on a four-place balance, averaged over at least five adjacent pairs, or acetone wash-off on a single specimen | The applied weight in g/m2. The substrate swamps the coating on a single pair, so average several pairs cut adjacent at the same cross-web position and quote the spread. Where the substrate is board, or where a tolerance tighter than about 10 per cent has to be resolved, weigh a coated specimen taken before the lamp, wash the uncured adhesive off that same specimen with acetone, dry and reweigh. |
| Haze and gloss | Transmission haze to ASTM D1003 or ISO 14782; specular gloss to ISO 2813 at a stated angle | Silvering and entrapped air are an internal scattering defect, so transmission haze is the number that tracks them on a clear laminate. ISO 2813 is specular gloss at 20, 60 and 85 degrees and measures the surface, not the interior; it is the right instrument for foil brightness and for a varnish, and the wrong one for silvering. |
| Viscosity | Rotational viscometer at a stated temperature and shear rate, spindle and speed recorded | The number that predicts transfer, coat weight and wet-out. UV laminating and cold-foil adhesives are shear thinning, so the shear rate has to be stated for the reading to mean anything, and a flow cup method such as ISO 2431, which assumes Newtonian or near-Newtonian behaviour, will not track what the anilox sees. |
| Sensory, odour and taint | DIN 10955, or the equivalent Robinson taint transfer test | Odour and taint transfer from the finished material, run blind against an unprinted reference and a known-good reel. State sample area, headspace volume, jar type, conditioning temperature and time, panel size and scoring scale, or the result will not settle a complaint. |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Seal strength | ASTM F88 | Where the laminate is sealed, this tells you whether the adhesive interface or the seal is the weak point. Run a jaw temperature ladder on the finished structure, after ageing and, where relevant, after filling, and note the temperature at which the failure mode changes from seal to delamination. It is a construction property, qualified on the customer own material. |
When the press-floor fixes have not worked