Troubleshooting guide
Fault finding for water-based gravure on paper and paper-based packaging: pH, cells, doctor blade, drying and resolubility.
Uniform Industries · Greater Noida, India · ufindustries.com
Figures are typical for the class and carry their test method. The values that govern a supply are those on the Technical Data Sheet for the grade.
Before you start
Work down the page. Cheap checks before expensive ones, and measure before you change anything.
01
What happens, in order, and the one variable held at each step.
The process
Control variables
| Variable | Target | How it is measured | How it drifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 9.0 plus or minus 0.3, that is 8.7 to 9.3, for amine-stabilised paper gravure grades, and the same window for film grades unless the grade sheet says otherwise. Dose stabiliser when the reading reaches 8.7. Treat 8.5 as the point at which the ink is already out of control, because that is where the alkali-soluble resin begins to come out of solution. | Calibrated glass electrode standing in the running ink in the tray, at press temperature. Buffer at pH 7 and pH 10 at the start of every shift, at the temperature of the ink, and record the slope where the meter reports it. Paper strips are not a measurement. | Falls steadily through the run as amine evaporates from the open tray and the dryer draught, typically 0.1 to 0.3 per hour on an uncovered tray in a warm pressroom. Nothing on the viscometer announces it; the first sign is a longer flow cup time. |
| Working viscosity | 15 to 20 s on a DIN 4 mm cup (DIN 53211) at 25 C, typical for this class; the grade sheet number for the job always wins | DIN 4 mm cup to DIN 53211, with a thermometer in the tray and the temperature written next to the reading. Name the cup on the log. The ISO 2431 4 mm flow cup is a different geometry with a different orifice and body, its reference temperature is 23 C rather than 25 C, and it gives a different efflux time for the same ink, so the two readings are not interchangeable and a target quoted for one cup does not apply to the other. | Rises with amine loss and with water loss from an open tray, and falls as pump work and dryer heat warm the ink. A 5 C rise takes roughly 2 s off the cup, about 0.4 s per degree, which is enough to hide a real thickening for most of a shift. |
| Ink temperature | 22 to 28 C, and within 2 C of the temperature at which the cup reading was set. Outside that, re-read the cup at the new temperature rather than correcting the ink. | Digital thermometer in the tray, not in the drum standing on the floor. Write the temperature next to every cup reading so the correction is arithmetic and not a guess. | Climbs through the shift from pump work and radiated dryer heat, then drops overnight. A press that sets viscosity cold in the morning and never re-reads it hot will thin the ink twice over. At roughly 0.4 s per degree, a 2 C tolerance is already most of the 1 s tolerance held on the cup. |
| Engraving geometry | Engrave for release and resolubility, not by a fixed percentage taken off a solvent cylinder. Widen the cell opening with a larger stylus angle, typically 130 to 140 degrees against 120 degrees for solvent work, and reduce depth to suit, then prove the volume on a print trial against measured solid density on the paper the job will run. Higher ink solids allows some of the volume reduction, but it is not the governing reason: a deep, narrow cell is the one that skins in and the one a water-based ink will not empty. | Cell depth gauge or calibrated microscope on the cylinder land, taken at a solid, a mid-tone and a highlight step, with the stylus angle and screen taken from the cylinder record. The final depth comes from the proof, not from an arithmetic rule. | Cells lose volume over the life of the cylinder as the chrome and the land wear, and highlights lose volume further as dried ink plugs them. Both show as a weak print at correct viscosity and correct pH, so measure cell depth on a high-mileage cylinder before changing anything in the ink. |
| Doctor blade pressure and angle | The lowest pressure that wipes the land clean, blade set at 55 to 65 degrees to the tangent, oscillation running | The pressure gauge on the blade holder where one is fitted; otherwise the count of hairlines on the print is the instrument. Isolate and lock off the drive before any work at the blade. | Operators raise it to chase a line. Water is a poor boundary lubricant compared with solvent, so the extra load goes straight into the edge: it wears a flat within the hour, the wipe degrades, and the lines multiply rather than clear. |
| Substrate surface energy, film work | 40 to 44 mN/m at the moment of printing on the reel about to run, wetting and holding for 2 s. Treat 38 mN/m as the reject limit rather than as the bottom of the window; water-based inks need more treatment than solvent inks for the same wet-out. | Test inks to ISO 8296 or dyne pens on the reel you are about to run, wetting tension to ASTM D2578. Not the supplier's certificate from the day it was made. | Decays on the reel with time, heat and warehouse storage, and slip additive blooms to the surface as the reel ages. A reel that measured 42 mN/m three months ago can be at 34 mN/m today. |
| Dryer air velocity and extraction | Air temperature is set by the heat tolerance of the substrate, not by the ink: typically 60 to 90 C on paper, and 50 to 75 C on PE and BOPP film with the web temperature held below the film's distortion limit. Set air volume and extraction first and use temperature last, and control to the measured web temperature at the dryer exit rather than to the panel setting. Nozzle velocity to the machine's own commissioning figure, recorded at commissioning and re-measured quarterly; impingement tunnels commonly sit in the region of 20 to 40 m/s at the nozzle face, but the commissioning number for the machine is the target, not the class figure. Exhaust air held well clear of saturation, with the extraction damper position logged. | Hot wire anemometer at the nozzle face, compared against the commissioning record. Hygrometer or wet bulb in the exhaust duct. Infra-red thermometer on the web at the dryer exit. | Filters load and nozzles block over weeks. Velocity falls while the temperature display stays exactly where it was set, so the panel says nothing has changed while the drying capacity has halved. Falling velocity at an unchanged temperature reading is the fault to look for. |
Control variables
| Variable | Target | How it is measured | How it drifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web temperature at dryer exit | 40 to 55 C on paper, measured before the chill roll; on film, below the distortion limit of the film in use | Infra-red thermometer aimed at the printed side at the last dryer exit, at the speed the job actually runs. | Falls as speed rises and as coverage increases. It is the earliest honest sign that the tunnel is out of capacity, well before the rub test fails. |
| Non-volatile matter and film weight | Typically 35 to 45 % non-volatile by weight for this class; the grade sheet figure for the specific product always wins. Dry film typically 1.5 to 3.0 g/m2 on paper. | Non-volatile matter to ASTM D2369 or an equivalent written in-house method: 1 to 2 g spread evenly in a tared dish, 60 min at 110 C, cooled in a desiccator and weighed, run in duplicate, with the method written down so every reading is comparable. Thirty minutes at 105 C does not take a water-based acrylic to constant weight and the figure reads differently depending on how the sample was spread. For printed samples, weigh, dry 60 min at 105 C, cool in a desiccator and re-weigh, and quote residual carrier as a percentage of the dry ink film rather than as a bare weight. Reel weight difference or print-and-weigh for film weight. | Non-volatile matter rises in an open tray as water leaves, and falls a step with every water addition. Two shifts of both, and the ink in the tray is no longer the ink on the data sheet. The comparison that matters on press is the tray sample against the unopened drum of the same batch. |
| Foam in the tray | No standing foam on the tray surface, and no air in the return stream | 50 ml shaken 30 s in a graduated cylinder; the foam head should collapse within about 30 s. | Builds through the shift as the ink level drops, the return line breaks the surface and the surfactant balance shifts. It starves the cells before it is visible as a print fault. |
| Make-up water and microbial control | Deionised or softened water only, from a clean dedicated line; biocide dosed to the supplied instruction and recorded; no ink left standing in the loop between jobs or over a shutdown; drums stored below 25 C and not below 5 C | Conductivity meter and a hardness test on the water line that actually feeds the press. Smell check on the tray and on the drum headspace at the start of every shift, and a dated biocide addition record. Handle biocide to its safety data sheet: gloves, goggles and extraction at the mixing point. | Hardness climbs when a softener regenerates late or a hose is taken off the treated line. Biocide is consumed over time and by every contamination event, so an ink that has been open and topped up for weeks has none left and will go sour over the first long shutdown. |
The mechanism
The single mechanism behind most water-based gravure faults. Amine loss, not solids gain, is usually what moves the flow cup, and the correction that reads well at the cup is the one that makes it worse. Measure pH in the running ink with a calibrated electrode at press temperature, and cross-check the electrode before you act on the number.
02 | 20 faults
Symptom, cause, check, change, confirm. The trap is the move to avoid.
Fault 1 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The flow cup reads longer every hour on the same ink, transfer falls off and density drifts down. The operator adds water, the cup comes back for a while, and by the second shift the ink is thin in the cup but printing weak and dirty.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 1 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
pH holds 8.7 to 9.3 over two hours of running and the DIN 4 mm cup time at 25 C stays within 1 s of the set point, with solid density on the scanning densitometer within 0.05 of the approved reel.THE TRAP
Adding water to bring the cup time down. It corrects the reading for about ten minutes, dilutes the amine further and takes the pH down another step, so the next thickening arrives sooner and deeper than the last. By the fourth correction the ink is both dilute and out of solution.Fault 2 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The press stands for ten minutes for a splice or a reel change. On restart the image comes back starved, mid-tones mottled and solids patchy, and it clears slowly over several hundred metres or does not clear at all.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 2 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
After a deliberate ten minute stop with the dryer at running settings, the print returns to full density and clean mid-tones within 50 m, repeated three times on the same job.THE TRAP
Winding on impression to force the tone back. Impression does not empty a dried cell; it flattens the covering, broadens the dot everywhere else, scores the blade and marks the paper, and the mottle is still there when you back it off.Fault 3 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Sharp fine lines running in the web direction through solids and mid-tones, one or two at first and more as the run goes on, shifting slightly across the web when blade oscillation is running. Blade life falls from a shift to an hour, the wipe degrades quickly after each change, and grazing light shows fine scoring on the cylinder land.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 3 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Line-free print over 2000 m with a fresh blade, the filter in place and pressure at the reduced setting, checked on the solid patch of the control strip, with blade life back to the press standard for that deck and no new scoring on the land under grazing light after a full shift.THE TRAP
Increasing blade pressure to wipe the line away, or fitting a harder blade to make it last. Pressure works for a minute, then the particle scores the edge into a flat and the flat leaves its own line. A harder edge that is still loaded too heavily transfers the wear to the chrome, so a blade problem becomes a re-chrome.Fault 4 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Tear-shaped drags trailing out of dense areas in the web direction, sharp at the head and fading at the tail, coming and going and worse as speed rises. Dark specks and grit in solids and light tints. Filters that used to run a shift block in an hour, and the residue on the mesh is dark and hard rather than soft ink.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 4 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
A filter that runs a full shift without blocking, no comets on the solid patch over 1000 m at full running speed, and print free of specks over 2000 m on a light tint, which is where specks show first.THE TRAP
Taking the filter out because it keeps blocking, or raising viscosity to weigh a comet tail down. Without the filter the grit goes under the blade instead of into the mesh, and a filter problem becomes hairlines, a worn blade and a scored cylinder. A thicker ink wipes worse, holds the particle longer and makes the tail longer, and it costs transfer in the highlights at the same time.Fault 5 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Fine highlight tones break up into white specks, vignettes go grainy where they should fade smoothly, and the effect is worst on the smoothest coated stock and at the top of the speed range.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 5 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
The step wedge prints continuously from 3 % upward at full running speed with no white specks, on three consecutive reels.THE TRAP
Winding on impression to fill the highlights. It never cures a release problem; it flattens the covering, causes dot gain and haloing in the mid-tones, and marks the paper, so a highlight fault becomes a full tone-curve fault.Fault 6 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Density below the approved reel on large solids, with a cloudy uneven look across the web. Worst on uncoated and recycled papers, and the mottle moves with the paper reel rather than with the press setting.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 6 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Solid density within 0.05 of the approved reel at five points across the web and holding over 2000 m, on the paper lot the job will actually run.THE TRAP
Thinning the ink and running faster to get the solid to level out. More water means less pigment per cell, and higher speed means less dwell in the dryer, so the solid goes weaker and the rub resistance goes with it.Fault 7 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The first reels match the approved print and the tenth does not. Density has crept down, the shade has moved slightly, and nothing obvious has been changed on the press.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 7 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Density and dE against the retained target hold reel to reel for the rest of the job, with the addition log showing no water added other than after a pH correction.THE TRAP
Correcting shade on press with additions of a strong base colour. It moves the shade back for one reel and leaves the job with an ink that no longer matches any batch on the shelf, so the next repeat starts from nowhere.Fault 8 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Colour comes off on a thumb at the rewind, reels mark each other in transit, printed bags scuff when they are filled. Often it looks fine at the machine and fails at the customer.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 8 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
50 dry Sutherland rubs at 1.8 kg with no visible transfer to the receptor, tested 24 h after printing and conditioned at 23 C and 50 % RH, on the reel that will go to the customer, with the acceptance agreed with the customer for the end use rather than fixed at 50 rubs for every job.THE TRAP
Turning the dryer temperature up and leaving the extraction where it was. Air that is already near saturation cannot take more water; the paper gets hotter, cockles and goes brittle, and the print is no drier than it was.Fault 9 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Print transfers to the reverse of the web, layers stick or tear when the reel is unwound at the converter, and it is worst near the core and in hot weather.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 9 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
No picking or face transfer after 24 h at about 100 kPa (1 kg/cm2) at the condition agreed for the supply chain, 40 C as routine and 50 C where the pack ships warm, and no blocking on reels unwound at the converter a week later.THE TRAP
Winding tighter because the reel is telescoping. Tighter winding raises interlayer pressure exactly where the blocking starts, so a handling problem at the rewind becomes a scrapped reel at the customer.Fault 10 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Colour transfers or smears under a damp cloth, on a bag carried in the rain, or on a wrap that has been in a chilled cabinet and picked up condensation.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 10 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
20 damp double rubs at 24 h with no colour on the pad, and no bleed after the pack has stood in a chill cabinet for 24 h on the customer's own board or film.THE TRAP
Asking for maximum resolubility and maximum water resistance from one ink. The press gets an ink that stops on the cylinder or a pack that runs in the rain; the honest answer is to say which failure cannot be afforded and put the other property in an overprint varnish.Fault 11 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
A head of foam sits on the tray, the pump note changes, and solids come out with small round holes and crater rims. Often it starts an hour into the run rather than at the start.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 11 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Foam collapses within 30 s in the cylinder test and solids print free of pinholes and craters over 1000 m at full speed.THE TRAP
Adding more defoamer because the foam is still there. Past the correct dose it stops working and starts creating repellence, and the craters that follow get read as an adhesion or substrate fault, so the ink gets changed for no reason.Fault 12 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
On BOPP or PE the ink pulls back into islands, solids show fisheyes, and fine type breaks up. The same ink runs perfectly on paper on the deck next door.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 12 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Test inks at 40 mN/m and above wet the reel and hold without drawing back for 2 s, and the printed solid runs free of fisheyes over a full reel.THE TRAP
Turning the dryer up or the impression on to force the ink to lie down. Neither makes a low energy surface wettable; the beads simply dry harder in place, and the heat starts to distort the film as well.Fault 13 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Peel is acceptable at 24 h, then drops after a week in the warehouse or after a hot fill. Tunnelling appears in the printed areas and the laminate delaminates cleanly at the ink.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 13 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Ply-bond peel holds at or above the value agreed with the customer after 7 days at 50 C, measured on the customer's own film, adhesive and construction, with the locus of failure recorded. Bond is a property of the pack and of the lamination, so it is qualified there and not claimed from the ink alone.THE TRAP
Raising adhesive coat weight to cover for a wet ink film. It buries the water instead of removing it, the laminate passes the 24 h test, and the failure surfaces after despatch when the whole order has been converted.Fault 14 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
Seals through the printed area peel open, channel, or fail at a lower force than the unprinted control from the same reel. It shows on the filling line rather than at the press, and it is worst on heavy solids that run to the edge, on heat-seal papers and on paper-based lidding.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 14 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Seal strength to ASTM F88 on the printed seal within the tolerance agreed with the customer against the unprinted control, on the customer's own material and sealing conditions, with the failure mode recorded. Seal performance is a property of the construction and the sealing conditions, so it is qualified there and not claimed from the ink.THE TRAP
Turning the jaw temperature up to force the printed seal to hold. It seals for the trial, and it distorts or embrittles the substrate and narrows the seal window, so a seal that needed a design change becomes a pack that fails somewhere else on the line.Fault 15 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The web goes wavy at the edges, register creeps between decks through the reel, and it is worst on lightweight uncoated paper with heavy coverage on one or two colours.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 15 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Paper moisture at the rewind within 1 % of the infeed reading, and register holding within the agreed tolerance from the start of the reel to the end, over three consecutive reels.THE TRAP
Drying harder to get the cockle out. It drives the sheet below its equilibrium moisture, so the wave becomes a curl, the fold cracks at the converter and the register error gets larger instead of smaller.Fault 16 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The press ran 300 m/min in February and will only hold 180 m/min now, on the same job and the same ink. Print is still wet at the last deck and rub tests fail at full speed.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 16 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Web temperature at the last dryer exit back in the 40 to 55 C window at the target speed on paper, with the 24 h Sutherland rub passing at that speed.THE TRAP
Closing the extraction to keep the heat in. It raises the tunnel temperature and the tunnel humidity together, so the air reaches the web hotter and already loaded with water, the drying gets worse and the paper gets hotter and cockles.Fault 17 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
A sour or sulphurous smell off the tray or off a returned drum, lids bulging on closed containers, pH and viscosity both falling over a weekend with nothing added, and gloss and rub resistance down on print from that batch. Worst after a shutdown, in warm weather, and on a loop that is left full between jobs.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 17 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
pH and flow cup hold across a weekend shutdown with the loop washed out, no sour smell off the tray or off the returned drums at the start of the next job, and no odour complaint on the packed product from that batch.THE TRAP
Dosing extra biocide into a batch that is already sour. The organisms die, but the breakdown products, the smell and the lost thickener stay, so the ink is now both spoiled and over-dosed. Biocide is a preservative for a clean ink, not a cure for a spoiled one.Fault 18 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The reel smells at the converter, or the customer reports a smell, or a taste transfer in the filled pack, usually days after despatch and usually from inside a stacked pallet or a closed carton. The print itself looks correct and passes the rub test.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 18 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Sensory result on the finished pack agreed with the customer, taken 24 h or more after printing on the reel that will ship, with residual carrier in the print at or below the level agreed for the job.THE TRAP
Wrapping and stacking hot reels to get them out of the way. The pallet holds the amine and the co-solvent in, the reverse of the web picks them up, and a drying fault that would have aired off in the warehouse arrives at the customer as a taint complaint on the filled pack.Fault 19 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The meter reads 9.0 in a tray that is visibly thickening, or 8.2 in an ink that is running perfectly. Two meters on the same tray read 0.4 apart. The reading drifts while the probe is standing in the ink, or it locks on one number and never moves.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 19 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
Two independently calibrated electrodes read within 0.1 of each other on the running ink, both buffer cleanly at 7 and 10 with the slope inside the maker's limit, and the same is true at the start of the following shift.THE TRAP
Trusting the number because the meter is new. A new electrode stored badly for a month is as wrong as an old one, and every decision in this document hangs on that one reading: ink is dosed, diluted, condemned or returned on the strength of it.Fault 20 of 20
WHAT YOU SEE
The printed decor paper looks correct at the rewind, then colour haloes into the resin during impregnation and the shade shifts after pressing.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
Fault 20 of 20 · continued
CHECK, IN THIS ORDER
THEN CHANGE
CONFIRM IT IS FIXED
No bleed or haloing in the customer's own impregnation and press cycle, with shade within the agreed dE measured on the pressed laminate, and blue wool 7 to 8 across the palette used.THE TRAP
Sealing the print with an overprint varnish to hold the colour in. The varnish stops the resin wetting the print, so the bleed becomes a delamination, and a colour problem turns into a structural failure in the finished laminate.03
One page to work from, and the methods behind every number.
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Viscosity climbing through the run | pH with a calibrated electrode in the running tray, cross-checked against a second electrode | Dose pH stabiliser, circulate five minutes, re-read; water last |
| Cells screened in after a stop | pH, then whether the cylinder was left clear of the ink in the pan | Keep the cylinder wetted on slow-turn with guards closed; close the dryer damper |
| Hairlines down the reel, blade life collapsing | Filter residue on a white tile and the blade edge under a loupe | New blade, clean holder, 100 um filter, drop blade pressure |
| Comets, specks and early filter blocking | Filter a litre of ink and look at what the mesh holds: hard grit, soft skin or slime | Strain the tray, wash the loop, fix the source of the grit |
| Speckled highlights, missing dots | Flow cup at press temperature after pH, then the impression covering hardness | Correct viscosity down after pH; treat ESA as a machine question, not a cure |
| Weak, mottled solids on paper | Density at five points across the web, then pH and flow cup, then the failing reel against the good reel | Set viscosity to the grade sheet and qualify the paper reel; measure cell depth only after that |
| Colour drifting weaker reel by reel | Density trend and the ink addition log since the OK reel | Stop water corrections, add fresh unthinned ink of the same batch |
| Rub failure at the rewind | Web temperature at the last dryer exit with an IR thermometer | Raise air volume and extraction before temperature |
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Reel blocking and picking | Reel core temperature and the winding tension taper | Chill before rewind and reduce taper tension |
| Colour bleeding when the pack is wet | Which grade is in the tray, resoluble or water resistant | Emulsion-rich grade, supplied cross-linker handled as a sensitiser, or a water-resistant OPV |
| Pinholes and craters in solids | Foam collapse in a graduated cylinder and the defoamer record | Submerge the return line and slow the pump; do not add defoamer |
| Ink beading on film | Test inks to ISO 8296 on the reel you are about to run | In-line corona to 40 to 44 mN/m, or a water-based primer |
| Lamination bond falling after ageing | Residual carrier in the print by weight loss, and the ply-bond peel at 24 h and 7 days | Complete the drying and change to a lamination grade; adhesive coat weight last |
| Printed seals failing on the filling line | ASTM F88 on the printed seal against the unprinted control from the same reel | Take the print out of the seal area, or cut film weight there |
| Print still wet at the last deck | Nozzle velocity against the commissioning figure and exhaust humidity | Clean the filters, open the extraction, cut film weight |
| Cockle, curl and register wander | Paper moisture before and after the dryer | Reduce film weight and air temperature, raise air volume |
Quick reference
| Symptom | Check this first | Change this first |
|---|---|---|
| Sour smell, pH and viscosity both falling | Smell the tray and the drum headspace; check when the loop was last washed out | Take the batch out of service and wash the loop; do not dose stabiliser or extra biocide |
| Odour or taint complaint on the packed product | Residual carrier in the print by weight loss, and reel core temperature at the rewind | Complete the drying and let reels air before wrapping; sensory test at 24 h |
| A pH number that does not match what the ink is doing | Buffer at 7 and 10 at ink temperature and read the slope; cross-check a second electrode | Clean or replace the electrode before any ink is dosed, diluted or condemned |
| Decor bleeding in impregnation | Which grade was used, and a laboratory press trial on the customer's resin and cycle | Decor grade without wax or slip, blue wool 7 to 8 across the palette |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Flow cup viscosity | DIN 53211, 4 mm cup (the DIN 4 cup) | Working viscosity as an efflux time. 15 to 20 s at 25 C on the DIN 4 mm cup is typical for water-based gravure, against 18 to 25 s for flexo. The ISO 2431 4 mm flow cup is a different geometry with a different orifice and body and a 23 C reference temperature, and it gives a different time for the same ink, so name the cup on the log and never compare a reading from one against a target set on the other. Take it in the tray at press temperature and record the temperature with the number, because a 5 C rise takes roughly 2 s off the reading. |
| Press-side pH | No single standard governs it; use a calibrated glass electrode buffered at pH 7 and pH 10 each shift at the temperature of the ink | The control variable for an amine-stabilised system. Acceptance 8.7 to 9.3 in the running ink at press temperature, dosing at 8.7, with 8.5 treated as already out of control because that is where the alkali-soluble resin begins to come out of solution. Record the slope where the meter reports it and keep a second calibrated electrode as a cross-check before any batch decision. Paper strips are not accurate enough to run a press on. |
| Non-volatile matter | ASTM D2369, or an equivalent written in-house method | Solids as supplied and solids in the tray. 1 to 2 g spread evenly in a tared dish, 60 min at 110 C, cooled in a desiccator and weighed, run in duplicate. Typically 35 to 45 % by weight for this class; the grade sheet figure for the product wins. The comparison that matters on press is the tray sample against the unopened drum of the same batch. For printed samples, weigh, dry 60 min at 105 C, cool in a desiccator and re-weigh, and quote residual carrier as a percentage of the dry ink film. |
| Rub resistance | ASTM D5264 has been withdrawn by ASTM; retain it as a described in-house method rather than citing it as an active standard | Handling resistance of the dried print. Sutherland rub tester, 4 lb (1.8 kg) weight, 50 strokes, printed face against the specified receptor stock, sample and receptor conditioned 24 h at 23 C and 50 % RH to ISO 187, then inspected for visible transfer to the receptor. Run the same test with a damp receptor for wet rub. Acceptance is agreed with the customer for the end use rather than fixed at 50 rubs for every job. |
| Wetting tension of the substrate | ASTM D2578, with test inks to ISO 8296 | Surface energy of the film at the moment of printing. 40 to 44 mN/m, wetting and holding for 2 s, measured on the reel about to run rather than taken from the mill certificate. Treat 38 mN/m as the reject limit, not as the bottom of the window; water-based inks need more treatment than solvent inks for the same wet-out. |
| Ink adhesion to film | Described tape test; ISO 2409 cross-cut only where the standard applies | Key of the dried ink to the surface. On flexible film, apply a defined tape to the print, state the tape type and width, press it down with a standard roller, pull at 180 degrees in one movement, and report the percentage of ink removed and the area tested. Name the tape, because the result is meaningless without it. Use ISO 2409 cross-cut only on rigid or board-backed substrates, since it is written for coatings on dimensionally stable substrates up to 250 um and a cross-cut blade drawn through a 1 to 3 g/m2 ink film on unsupported BOPP or PE cuts the substrate and gives a classification that means nothing. Adhesion is an interface property of the customer's own material, so it is qualified on their reel and not claimed for the ink alone. |
| Ply-bond peel | ASTM F904, or a described T-peel | Lamination bond on a laminated construction. ASTM F904 compares ply adhesion of flexible laminates; where a described method is used instead, state it in full, for example T-peel at 15 mm width and 100 mm/min. Measure at 24 h, at 7 days and after ageing at 50 C, and report the width, the rate, the peel angle and the locus of failure, whether ink to film, ink to adhesive or adhesive to film. ASTM D3330 is the peel test for pressure-sensitive tape and is not the test for laminate ply bond. Bond is a property of the construction, the adhesive and the cure as much as of the ink, so it is agreed and qualified on the customer's own laminate. |
Test methods
| Measurement | Method | What it tells you, and the usual acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Seal strength | ASTM F88 | Force to separate a seal, run on the printed seal against an unprinted control cut from the same reel, on the customer's own construction. Record the jaw temperature, dwell and pressure actually used and the failure mode: peel, tear, or delamination at the ink. Seal performance is a property of the construction and the sealing conditions, so it is qualified there and not claimed from the ink. |
| Light fastness | Filtered xenon arc exposure of the print, reported on the blue wool scale as defined in ISO 105-B01 and ISO 105-B02 | Expected life under light. The blue wool scale is the right reference scale, but ISO 105-B02 itself is a textile standard and is cited here only for the scale, not as the exposure method for a print. State the exposure conditions and whether the print was tested as a solid or as a tint, since tints fade faster than solids of the same pigment. Blue wool 3 is adequate for short-life promotional wrap; bags and outdoor use need 6 and above; decor laminates for furniture and flooring need 7 to 8 across the whole palette including the tint bases. |
| Blocking test | No standard cited; described method | Whether the reel will stick. 10 cm squares, printed face to web reverse, under about 100 kPa (1 kg/cm2) for 24 h, at 40 C as the routine condition and at 50 C where the pack ships or stores warm, then peeled and inspected for picking and face transfer. Quote the pressure in kPa with the kg/cm2 equivalent in brackets, agree the condition with the customer for the actual supply chain, and run it on the job before the reels are stacked and shipped. |
| Sensory testing of the pack | Sensory examination of packaging materials as described in DIN 10955 | Whether residual amine, ammonia, co-solvent or additive can be smelled or tasted in the packed product. Run it on the finished pack, 24 h or more after printing, on the reel that will ship rather than on a press-side cut, and record the drying condition and the residual carrier figure alongside the result, because odour tracks residual carrier rather than ink chemistry alone. |
| De-inkability | INGEDE Method 11, scored against the EPRC De-inkability Scorecard | Whether the print releases in the pulper and is removed by flotation. De-inkability is a property of the whole print, that is the ink, the coat weight, the substrate and any varnish, and it is assessed case by case. Water-based acrylic prints can score poorly on flotation de-inking because the ink disperses to fine particles, and filtrate darkening and low ink elimination are the usual failure routes. No de-inkability statement is made to a customer, for any grade or range, until a scorecard result exists on the actual print. |
When the press-floor fixes have not worked